Skip to content

Section V And - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Miranda rights

an arresting officer must advise the person being arrested see also Miranda v. Arizona in the Important Cases section NOTE: A reading of the Miranda rights usually includes a warning that anything said could be used as

penumbra

governmental intrusion "Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)"] see also Griswold v. Connecticut in the Important Cases section pe·num·bral [-brəl] adj

privacy

privacy interest at interest, right of privacy Griswold v. Connecticut and Roe v. Wade in the Important Cases section

Keep your definitions linked to case research

privilege

the functions and decision-making process of that branch see also United States v. Nixon in the Important Cases section NOTE: Executive privilege is based on the separation of powers doctrine. In United States v. Nixon, the Supreme

separate but equal

unconstitutional see also Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka and Plessy v. Ferguson in the Important Cases section

Board of Control

the Mental Treatment Act, 1930, under s. 14 of that Act, together with other powers mentioned in that section, and also the powers and duties of the Lunacy Commissioners which were transferred to the (English) Board by … Board of Control. The (English) Mental Treatment Act, 1930 (20 & 21 Geo. 5, c. 23), established five Commissioners, including the Chairman, all of whom are paid. The Commissioners are styled senior

Ecclesiastical dilapidations

former (English) Acts (34 & 35 Vict. c. 43 and 35 & 36 Vict. c. 96). The 54th section of the (English) Act of 1871 directs incum-bents to insure. … and 19 & 20 Geo. 5, No. 3), which have replaced the former (English) Acts (34 & 35 Vict. c. 43 and 35 & 36 Vict. c. 96). The 54th section of the (English) Act of 1871

Game

he is doing that which is unlawful, and an action may be maintained for the damage sustained, Farrer v. Nelson, (1885) 15 QBD 258. S. 11(5) of the Agricultural Holdings Act, 1923, gives the following definition:- For … 258. S. 11(5) of the Agricultural Holdings Act, 1923, gives the following definition:- For the purposes of this section the expression 'game' means deer, pheasants, partridges, grouse, and black game; And, subject to certain restrictions and conditions,

foreseeability

limited to losses that are foreseeable see also Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. in the Important Cases section

Liquor

for beverage purposes and produce intoxication, but also all liquids containing alcohol, the definition of liquor contained in section 2(24) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 is not therefore ultra vires. State of Bombay v F.N. Balsara,

  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial