Section 351 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Manner
1972 SC 801: (1971) 3 SCC 602: (1972) 1 SCR 351. [State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, s. 32 (8)]
Mistake
completion of the purchase, Palmer v. Johnson, (1884) 13 QBD 351; but where the misdescription is so serious as to go
Wheels
the said entry, Dewan Enterprises v. C.S.T., (1996) 8 SCC 351 (352). [Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 (15 of 1948),
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Such doubly taxed income
v. CIT, AIR 1973 SC 2172 (2181): (1973) 3 SCC 351: (1973) 2SCR 650.
Vastum forest' vel bosci
destroyed that it lay, in a manner, waste, Parpch. Antiq. 351.
Vegetable
Ram Bux Chaturbhuj v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1963 SC 351 (352). [Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 (29 of 1954), s.
Vicarious responsibility
his agent is one, Pearson v. Dublin Corporation 1907 AC 351; although the functions may have been divided and one only
Wherever they may be serving
service, Ajit Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1976 P&H 351.
Forinsecum manerium
is not included within the liberties of it, Paroch. Antiq. 351.
Generalibus specialia derogant
Generalibus specialia derogant. Lofft, 351; Halkerston, 51.-(Special things derogate from general.)
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace — 7 days free