Sec 139 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Mallak
intended to be conferred, Ram Gopal v. Nandlal, 1951 SC 139; Sakarlal Chootolal v. Mehta Chunilal Manilal, 1953 Sau 146 (DB).
Per incuriam
Uttar Pradesh v. Synthtics and Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 (162).
Panchangam
Panchangam, is an ordinary literary work, AIR 1941 Mad 139 (144).
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Malikyat
'Malik' or owner, Ram Gopal v. Nand Lal, 1951 SC 139.
Omits and refuses
Omits and refuses, the words omits and refuses indicates the essential element of volition and includes an omission, AIR 1966...
Sanad, deed and other instrument
definition, Bishambhar Singh v. State of Orissa, AIR 1954 SC 139 (145). [Orissa Estates Abolition Act (10 of 1952), s. 2(h)]
Same transaction
IC 135: Raj Kishore Tewari v. Rex, AIR 1949 All 139; Faiz Mohammad v. Emperor, (1945) ILR 1945 Ker 100. Same
Warren
11 Ch D 798; Fitzhardinge(Lord) v. Purcell, (1908) 2 Ch 139. 1. A place for preservation of certain wildlife. 2. A
Sub-silentio
Uttar Pradesh v. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139 (163).
Synod
authority of synods in the Church of England, see Canons 139-141. A synod in Scotland is composed of three or more
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free