Returned Candidate And Contesting Candidate - Law Dictionary Search Results
Home Dictionary Name: returned candidate and contesting candidateReturned candidate and contesting candidate
Returned candidate and contesting candidate, a returned candidate is one who has been elected and a contesting candidate is one who has not withdrawn his candidature under s. 37, Har Swarup v. Brij Bhusan Saran, AIR 1967 SC 836: (1967) 1 SCR 342. [Representation of the People Act, 1951, s. 82(a), 37)]...
Contesting candidate and returned candidate
Contesting candidate and returned candidate, a returned candidate is one who has been elected and a contesting candidate is one who has not withdrawn his candidature under s. 37. In clause (a) of s. 82 the words 'he himself or any other candidate', 'any other candidate' there means any other contesting candidate, Har Swarup v. Brij Bhushan Swarup, AIR 1967 SC 836 (838): (1967) 1 SCR 342. [Representation of the People Act, 1951, s. 82(a)]...
Materially affected
Materially affected, What s. 100 requires is that the High Court before it declares the election of a returned candidate is void should be of opinion that the result of the election insofar as it concerns a returned candidate has been materially affected by the improper acceptance of any nomination. It is not intended to provide a convenient technical plea in a case like this where there can be no dispute at all about the election being materially affected by the accepted of the improper nomination. 'Materially affected' is not a formula that has got to be specified but it is an essential requirement that is contemplated in this section, Durai Muthuswami v. N. Nachiappan, AIR 1973 SC 1419: (1973) 2 SCC 45: (1974) 1 SCR 40.These words indicate that the result should not be judged by the mere increase or decrease in the total number of votes secured by the returned candidate but by proof of the fact that the wasted votes would have been distributed in such a manner between the contesting...
The result of the election has been materially affected
The result of the election has been materially affected, these words seems to us to indicate that the result should not be judged by the mere increase or decrease in the total number of votes secured by the returned candidate but by proof of the fact that the wasted votes would have been distributed in such a manner between the contesting candidates as would have brought about the defeat of the returned candidate, Vashisht Narain Sharma v. Dev Chandra, AIR 1954 SC 513 (515). [Representation of the people Act, 1951, s. 100(1)(c)]...
- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial