Skip to content

Rebuttal - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Triplicatio

Triplicatio, a rebutter.

presumption

existence of some other fact conclusive presumption : a presumption that the law does not allow to be rebutted called also irrebuttable presumption compare rebuttable presumption in this entry mandatory presumption : a presumption that a jury

surrebuttal

surrebuttal often attrib [sur- over + rebuttal] : the response to the rebuttal of the opposing party in a proceeding [testimony of defense witnesses "Arizona

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Presumption

presumption is raised under s. 114 of the Evidence Act. Under statutory presumption, the presump-tion has to be rebutted by 'proof' and not by a bare explanation which is merely plausible, Ram Kishan Bedu Rane v. State

closing argument

the closing argument after the closing of the evidence. The defense replies, and the prosecution may offer a rebuttal.

reciprocal

with another of the same category [was prevented from obtaining discovery of the names of the State's alibi rebuttal witnesses "Mauricio v. State, 652 N.E.2d 869 (1995)"] ;also : marked by such correspondence or equivalence between its

case

of a party's case including arguments for which the party bears the burden of proof but not including rebuttal prima facie case : a case established by evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact

Judicial proceeding

right to inspect the record and all relevant documents before he is called upon to lead evidence in rebuttal, Suraj Mall Mohta and Co. v. A.V. Visvanatha Sastri, AIR 1954 SC 545 (553). [Income Tax Act, 1992,

witness

that forms the proper foundation for admission of evidence under the business records exception to the hearsay rule rebuttal witness : a witness called upon to rebut evidence already presented 3 : one who is called on

Advancement

stranger, however, holding the interest vested in him in trust for the parent. The presumption of advancement is rebuttable by parol or other extrinsic evidence. In all cases the whole of the surrounding circumstances must be considered

  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial