Ram V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Pardanashin lady
conclusively that the deed was not only executed by, but was explained to and really understood byher, Bhikary Ram v. Hedait Mohammad Sahaji, AIR 1985 Ori 62. A lady in a veil, normally worn by Muslim ladies as
Remit
means to pardon, to refrain from inflicting to give up. A remission of sentence does not mean acquittal, Ram Deo Chauhan v. State of Assam, AIR 2001 SC 2231. [See Constitution of India, Art. 72 & 161;
Permit
is to be understood indicative of a formal consent, grant or authorization or to giving of express licence, Ram Singh Pritam Singh v. Chief Commissioner, AIR 1968 P&H 470. Means giving a passing consent or just, not
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Schizophrenia
a form of psychosis, which is more serious than other types of mental illnesses, Rohini Prasad Lal Bihari Ram v. Union of India, (1995) MLJ 268. Schizophrenia, is one of a group of severe emotional disorders, usually of
Qabiz
where even the word 'malik' would be more appropriate, Waris Ali v. Ghulam Dastagir, 139 IC 569; Gopi Ram v. Achhru Ram, 65 IC 462. The word 'Qabiz' does not necessarily mean something less than Malik.
Recruitment year
in which recruit-ment takes place, but not each three successive years in which the vacancy exists, Harish Chandra Ram v. Mukh Ram Dubey, 1994 Supp (2) SCC 490 (492).
Recital
the instrument itself, the recitals operate as an estoppel, though would not be so on a collateral matter, Ram Charan Das v. Girja Nandini Devi, AIR 1966 SC 323: (1965) 1 SCWR 837: (1966) 1 SCJ 61.
Cattle fodder
the expression 'cattle fodder' is inclusive of everything that is fed to cattle including damaged wheat, C.S.T. v. Ram Chandra Asa Ram, (2001) 9 SCC 313 (316). [Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 (15 of 1948), s.
Cause of action
is maintainable for ejectment, because the fresh trespass creates a fresh cause of action, Ajit Chopra v. Sadhu Ram, (2000) 1 SCC 114. Every fact which it is necessary to establish to support a right or obtain,
Person aggrieved
usual course or similar benefits or advantage or results in wrongful affectation of his title to compensation, Babu Ram v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1995) 2 SCC 689. [Land Acquisition Act, 1894, s. 28A]
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free