Queen S Bench - Law Dictionary Search Results
Exchequer Chamber, Court of
to revision by the judges of the other two, sitting collectively. See 27 Eliz. c. 8 (error from Queen's Bench), and 11 Geo. 4 & 1 Wm. 4, c. 70, s. 8 (error from the three Courts).
Coke, Sir Edward
1578, counsel in Shelley's case (see that title), Speaker of the House of Commons, Solicitor-General and Attorney-General under Queen Elizabeth, knighted by James I. shortly after his accession in 1603, made Chief Justice of the Common Pleas … after his accession in 1603, made Chief Justice of the Common Pleas in 1606 and of the King's Bench in 1613, 'taking particular delight,' writes Lord Campbell in his Lives of the Chief Justices, 'in styling himself
Admiralty Court
Admiralty Court, includes the Admiralty Court of Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice and any other court exercising Admiralty Jurisdiction. Halsbury's Laws of
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Admiralty proceedings
Admiralty proceedings, means proceedings in the Admiralty Court of the Queen's Bench Divison of the High Court of Justice and in any other court exercising Admiralty Jurisdiction. Halsbury's Laws
Superior courts
Superior courts, the Courts of Chancery, King's (or Queen's) bench, Common Pleas, and Exchequer, at Westminster, were so called. See these Courts treated of under the proper
Tested
Chancellor if issuing from the Court of Chancery, or of the Lord Chief Justice if issuing from the Queen's Bench, etc.
Postman
Exchequer Division of the High Court, who had precedence in motions till the Exchequer was merged in the Queen's (now King's) Bench Divi-sion
Bail Court
Bail Court, sometimes called the Practice Court, was an auxiliary of the Court of Queen's Bench. It heard and determined ordinary matters, and disposed of common motions, Consult Chit. Arch. Prac.
Paper-days
proposed to hear the cases entered in the Special Paper for argument. They were also fixed in the Queen's Bench, Crown Paper-days for disposing of business on the Crown side of the Court. On these days no
Semper pr'sumitur pro negante
Beauclerk (formerly Holden), 1906 AC 148]; and if any cort be equally divided [as was the Court of Queen's Bench in Reg. v. Archbishop of Canterbury, (1848) 11 QB 483, on the question whether the opposition to
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free