Skip to content


Preventive Detention - Law Dictionary Search Results

Home Dictionary Name: preventive detention Page 1 of about 43 results ( seconds)

Preventive detention

Preventive detention. By the (English) Prevention of Crime Act, 1908 (8 Edw. 7, c. 59), s. 10, as amended by the (English) Indictments Act, 1915 (5 & 6 Geo. 5, c. 90), a person after three previous convictions after attaining sixteen years of age, can with the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions, R. v. Waller, (1910) 1 KB 364, in certain cases be charged, R. v. Smith, (1910) 1 KB 17, with being an habitual criminal, and if the charge is established, he can, in addition to a punishment of penal servitude, receive a further sentence of not less than five years or more than ten years, called a sentence of preventive detention. During such detention the Secretary of State has power to let the person out on licence, if he is satisfied that there is a reasonable probability that he will abstain from crime and lead a useful an industrious life, or that he is no longer capable of engaging in crime. Unless the offender admits he is an habitual criminal the jury must determine whether...


Preventive detention and punitive detention

Preventive detention and punitive detention, there is a vital distinction between these two kinds of detention. 'Punitive detention' is intended to inflict punishment on a person, who is found by the judicial process to have committed an offence, while 'preventive detention' is not by way of punishment at all, but it is intended to prevent a person from indulging in conduct injurious to the society. The power of preventive detention has been recognised as a necessary evil and is tolerated in a free society in the larger interest of security of the State and maintenance of public order. It is a drastic power to detain a person without trial and there are many countries where it is not allowed to be exercised except in times of war or aggression, Francis Coralie Mullin v. Adm UT of Delhi, AIR 1981 SC 746 (749): (1981) 1 SCC 608....


Punitive and preventive detention

Punitive and preventive detention, 'punitive deten-tion' is intended to inflict punishment on a person, who is found by the judicial process to have committed an offence, while 'preventive detention' is not by way of punishment at all, but it is intended to pre-empt a person from indulging in conduct injurious to the society. The power of preventive detention has been recognised as a necessary evil and is tolerated in a free society in the larger interest of security of the State and maintenance of public order. It is a drastic power to detain a person without trial and there are many countries where it is not allowed to be exercised except in times of war or aggression. Our Constitution does recognise the existence of this power, but it is hedged-in by various safeguards set out in Articles 21 and 22; Francis Coralie Mullion v. Administrator, AIR 1981 SC 746: (1981) 1 SCC 608: (1981) 2 SCR 516....


preventive detention

preventive detention : detention of a defendant awaiting trial for the purpose of preventing further misconduct or protecting an individual or the public ...


Such detention

Such detention, refers to preventive detention and not to any period for which such detention is to continue because the decision about the period of detention can only be taken by the detaining authority, State of West Bengal v. Ashok Dey, (1972) 1 SCC 199; Pooran Lal v. Union of India, 1958 SCR 460. [See Constitution of India, Art. 22(a)(4)]The expression 'such detention' in Article 22(4)(a) of the Constitution refers to preventive detention and not to an period for which such detention should continue and s. 11(1) of the Preventive Detention Act does not contravene the provision of Article 22(4) (a) of the Constitution, Puranlal Lakhanpal v. Union of India, AIR 1958 SC 163: (1958) SCR 460. See also State of West Bengal v. Ashok Dey, AIR 1972 SC 1660....


Punitive detention

Punitive detention, is intended to inflict punish-ment or a person who is found by the judicial process to have committed an offence while preventive detention is not by way of punishment at all, but is intended to pre-empt a person from indulging in conduct injurious to the society, Francis Coraise Mullin v. Administration of Delhi, AIR 1981 SC 746: (1981) Cr LJ 306.Means when a person as a result of conviction for some offence or where he is under preventive detention because of an order of detention having been made under the defence of India Rules or the Preventive Detention Act, Harkishan Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1996 Punj 248....


Period of detention

Period of detention, undergone by the accused to be set off against the sentence of imprisonment. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), s. 265-9. See also Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005 (2 of 2006), s. 4.The expression 'period of detention' in s. 428, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 does not include the detention under preventive detention laws such as the Preventive Detention Act or MISA. Champalal Poonjaji Shah v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1982 SC 791: (1982) 1 SCC 507: (1982) 3 SCR 61....


Detained

Detained, 'detained' includes detained under any law providing for preventive detention. (Civil Procedure Code, 1908, O. 16A, R. 1)Detained includes detained under any law providing for preventive detention. [Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, s. 266(a)]...


Vagueness of ground, irrelevant ground

Vagueness of ground, irrelevant ground, a distinction between grounds which are merely vague and those which are extraneous or irrelevant often tends to be over-looked. Particulars of vague grounds can be, as seen already, supplied even later so as to show that the grounds were justified. If not supplied, the detenu can also ask for them. But, no amount of particulars of it would cure the defect of a ground given which is extraneous to the purposes for which preventive detention may be ordered. Any such ground would vitiate the detention order at its inception. At any rate, this Court could not separate the extraneous or irrelevant ground from the proper and the relevant ones. It could only order the release of detenu because something extraneous to the legally authorised objects of detention had also affected the decision to detain, Prabhu Dayal Deorah v....


Revocation

Revocation, includes cancellation of all orders invalid as well as valid, Hadibandu Das v. District Magistrate, AIR 1969 SC 43 (48). [Preventive Detention Act, 1950, s. 13(2)]The undoing of a thing granted, or a destroying or making void of some deed that had existence until the act of revocation made it void. It may be either general, of all acts and things done before; or special, to revoke a particular thing, 5 Rep. 90.The word revocation' means annulling, rescinding, withdrawing. In the facts and circumstances of the case orders of release cancelling orders of detention amount to revocation of orders of detention, Pradip Kumar Das v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1974 SC 2151 (2153): (1975) 3 SCC 335: (1975) 1 SCR 327. [MISA., s. 14(2)]Revocation is a process of recall of what had been done, Ibrahim Bachu Bafan v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1985 SC 697 (700): (1985) 2 SCC 24: (1985) 2 SCR 891.The word revocation is only apposite when it is intended to repeal, annul or withdraw some order wh...


  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //