Presumable - Law Dictionary Search Results
Home Dictionary Name: presumableMay presume and shall presume
May presume and shall presume, The expressions 'may presume' and 'shall presume' are defined in s. 4 of the Evidence Act. The presumptions falling under the former category are compendiously known as 'factual presumptions' or 'discretionary presumptions' and those falling under the latter as 'legal presumptions' or 'compulsory presumptions'. When the expression 'shall be presumed' is employed in s. 20(1) of the Act it must have the same import of compulsion, M. Narsinga Rao v. State of A.P., AIR 2001 SC 318 (321): (2001) 1 SCC 691 [Indian Evidence Act, 1872, s. 4]...
Shall presume
Shall presume, denotes that the court would pre-sume in that event, no discretion has been left with the court and there is a legislative command to it to raise a presumption and regard such fact as proved unless and until it is disproved. In such an eventuality, the question of calling upon the parties to formally prove a document does not arise, Haradhan Mahatha v. Kuhju Mahatha, AIR 1993 Pat 129: (1993) 2 Pat LJR 28: (1993) 2 BLJ 289: (1993) BBCJ 355.Shall presume, these words i.e., 'shall presume' are being used in Indian judicial tore for over a century to convey that they lay down a rebuttable presumption in respect of matters with reference to which they are used, Sodhi Transport Co. v. State of U.P., AIR 1986 SC 1099: (1986) 2 SCC 486: (1986) 1 SCR 939....
Presume
Presume, in Black's Law Dictionary, it has been defined to mean 'to believe or accept upon probable evidence'. In Shorter Oxford English Dictionary it has been mentioned that in law 'presume' means 'to take as proved until evidence to the contrary is forthcoming', Stroud's Legal Dictionary has quoted in this context a certain judgment according to which 'A presumption is a probable consequence drawn from facts (either certain, or proved by direct testimony) as to the truth of a fact alleged, State of Maharashtra v. Som Nath Thapa, AIR 1996 SC 1744 (1750): (1996) 4 SCC 659....
presume
presume pre·sumed pre·sum·ing : to suppose to be true without proof or before inquiry : accept as a presumption [must the defendant is innocent] ...
presumed damages
presumed damages see damage ...
Presumable
Such as may be presumed or supposed to be true that seems entitled to belief without direct evidence...
Presumably
In a presumable manner by or according to presumption...
Presumer
One who presumes also an arrogant person...
Children
Children. The word child in legal documents means a legitimate child unless otherwise declared by statute. See Morris v. Britannic Assurance Co., 1931 (2) KB 125. 'Child' is defined by the (English) Children and Young Persons Act, 1933 (23 & 24 Geo. 5, c. 12), s. 107, as meaning, for the purposes of the Act, a person under fourteen years of age. The (English) Children and Young Persons (Scotland) Act, 1932 (22 & 23 Geo. 5, c. 47), makes provisions for Scotland similar to those of the corresponding English Act.Registration of Birth, and Vaccination.--It is the duty, by s. 1 of the (English) Births and Deaths Registration act, 1874 (37 & 38 Vict. c. 88), of the father and mother of very child born alive, and in their default of other persons (see BIRTHS), to give information to the registrar within forty two days; the (English) Public Health Act, 1936, ss. 2 and 3, provides for compulsory notification of births to the Medical Officer of Health (see BIRTHS), and the child must be vaccinat...
Age
Age, the criminal responsibility of males and females, and their power to do certain acts, depends upon their age. A child under 7 cannot commit any offence; between the ages of 7 and 14 is presumed to be doli incapax, but this presumption may be rebutted by evidence of the infant's capacity to discern good from evil (malitia supplet 'tatem-malice supplies age). The old rule in criminal matters was that a person of the age of 14 might be capitally punished for any capital offence, but under the age of 7 he could not. A male under the age of 14 years is presumed impotent as well as doli incapax, and since the presumption of impotence cannot be rebutted, R. v. Phillips, 8 C& P 736, he cannot be convicted of an offence involving carnal knowledge, except as a principal in the second degree in a rape, or the like, where if he has a mischievous discretion, the presumption of impotence will not excuse him from aiding and assisting in the commission of the offence. He may, it seems, be convict...
- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial