Pratap V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
During the pleasure
v. Abdul Majid, AIR 1954 SC 245 (250): 1954 SCR 786. [Constitution of India, Art. 310(1)] See also Pratap Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1964 SC 72.
Neglect
attention, or time to. The fail through thoughtlessness or carelessness. To ignore or disregard', Laxmikant Devchand Bhojwani v. Pratap Singh Mohan Singh Pardeshi, (1994) 6 SCC 576 (579). [Bombay Rents, Hotels and Lodging House Rates Control Act,
Public disorder
cannot be detained on the ground that they were disturbing public order, State of Uttar Pradesh v. Sanjai Pratap Gupta @ Pappu, (2004) 8 SCC 591.
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Quasi Judicial Act
party to be affected of being heard and whenever necessary leading evidence in support of his contentions, Avadhesh Pratap Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1952 All 63 (69). (Constitution of India, Art. 226) The concept
Removal
the equivalent of loss of service but the loss of 'post', 'station' or 'office', R.P. Kapur v. S. Pratap Singh Kairon, AIR 1964 SC 295: (1964) 4 SCR 224. (ii) The word 'removal' contemplates shifting of a
Sedition
excite such an amount of intense hatred, contempt or disaffection as may lead to tumult or public disorder, Pratap New Delhi v. Crown, AIR 1949 EP 305: (1949) 51 Pat LR 234.
Calligraphists
an Artist; (2) he should perform journalists work; and (3) he should also calligraph matters, Management of Daily Pratap v. Their Katibs (1973) 1 SCR 438: AIR 1972 SC 1872: (1972) 2 SCC 342. [Working Journalists ...... Act
Katibs
Katibs, are Artists who perform journalistic work and who also calligraph matters, Management of Daily Pratap v. Katibs, AIR 1972 SC 1872 (1878). [Working Journalists Conditions of Service and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 s. 2(f)]
Calculated
the calculated effect, not on the actual result, though the latter proves the former, Sheopal Singh v. Ram Pratap (1965) 1 SCR 175: AIR 1965 SC 677 (679).
Endowment
property for purposes of religion or charity having both the subject and object certain and capable of ascertainment, Pratap Singh Ji N. Desai v. Deputy Charity Commissioner, AIR 1987 SC 2004 (2069): 1987 Supp SCC 714.
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free