Skip to content

Passenger - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Riding or driving furiously

an offence against the Highway Act, 1835, s. 78 (if it endanger the life or limb of any passenger), punishable by fine up to 5l. (10l. if the owner) in addition to liability to civil action. See

Tramways

rates, see Thornton Urban Council v. Blackpool Tramraod Co., 1909 AC 264, and as to liability to a passenger, see Clarke v. West Ham Corporation, (1909) 2 KB 858, and QUARTER RATING

Insurance

& 21 Geo. 5, c. 43), s. 35. See Monk v. Courbey, (1935) 1 KB 75 (owner permitting passenger to drive so that car was uninsured, liable in damages for breach of statutory duty). The (English) Third

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Omnibus

Act, char-a-bancs, wagonettes, brakes, stage-coaches, and other carriages plying or standing for hire by or used to carry passengers at separate fares. See, generally, London Passenger Transport Act, 1933 (23 Geo. 5, c. 14); Road Traffic Act,

Parcel

the time of search (see the Rules). Means goods entrusted to a railway administration for carriage by a passenger or a parcel train. [Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989), s. 2 (27) ]

Personal luggage

Personal luggage, personal luggage has been de-fined as whatever a passenger takes with him for his personal use or convenience, either with reference to his immediate necessities or for

Pyke, paik

Pyke, paik, a foot-passenger; a person employed as a night-watch in a village, and as a runner or messenger on the business of the revenue, Indian.

Luggage

Luggage, means the goods of a passenger either carried by him in his charge or entrusted to a railway administration for carriage. [Railways Act, 1989

Salvage

upon such occasions, the whole of their possible service being pledged to the master and owners. Neither are passengers entitled to anything for the ordinary assistance they may have afforded a vessel in distress. But a passenger

Tort

transitu [Pontifex v. Mid. Ry. Co., (1877) 3 QBD 23]; and an action for injury to a railway passenger [Kelly v. Metropolitan Ry. Co., (1895) 1 QB 944]. The distinction between tort and contract is not a

  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial