Other V State - Law Dictionary Search Results
Public interest
an act beneficial to the general public. It means action necessarily taken for public purpose, Babu Ram Verma v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1971) All LJ 653: (1971) Serv LR 649: (1971) 2 Lab LJ 235: (1971) Lab … (1971) Lab IC 1162 (All). Means of concern or advantage to people as a whole, T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka, (2002) 8 SCC 481. Means retention of honest and efficient employees and weeding of inefficient and
Tribunal
the State and are invested with judicial, as distinguished from purely administrative or executive functions, Durga Shankar Mehta v. Thakur Raghuraj Singh, AIR 1954 SC 520: 1954 SCJ 723: (1954) 2 Mad LJ 385. Tribunal, labour court
Organised crime
other person or promoting insurgency. [Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, s. 2(e)] --See Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsingh Sharma v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2005 SC 2277. Any continuing unlawful activity by an individual, singly or jointly, either as … gaining undue economic or other advantage for himself or any other person or promoting insurgency, Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2005 SC 2277. [See Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, (30 of 1999), s. 2(1)(e)]
Keep your definitions linked to case research
State
Matched in: Term State
Preamble
if the latter, contrary to many decisions of our court be considered vague, His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461: (1973) 4 SCC 225: (1973) Supp SCR 1. Preamble' has been defined … setting forth the grounds and intention of it'. The preamble thus betokens that which follows, Mohd. Yusuf Rather v. State of Jammu and Kashmir, AIR 1979 SC 1925 (1928): (1979) 4 CC 370: (1980) 1 SCR 258. Preamble'
May
Uttar Pradesh v. Manbodan Lal, 1957 SC 912; Kamar Singh v. Delhi Administration, 1965 SC 971; Banwari Lal v. State of Bihar, 1961 SC 849; Narayana Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 1957 SC 737. [See also Civil … Singh v. Delhi Administration, 1965 SC 971; Banwari Lal v. State of Bihar, 1961 SC 849; Narayana Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 1957 SC 737. [See also Civil Procedure Code, 1908, s. 39] The word 'may' in
Account stated
the account and the admission of the balance implies a promise in law to pay it; see Irving v. Veitch, (1837) 3 M&W 106. The account must have been stated before action brought. An account stated, however, … Account stated, An account stated is the admission of a balance due from one party to another, and that balance
Terrorism
forms of violence, therefore, appears to be the deliberate and systematic use of coercive intimidation, Hitendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1994 SC 2623 (2629): (1994) 4 SCC 602; see also Mohd Iqbal M. Shaikh v. … State of Maharashtra, AIR 1994 SC 2623 (2629): (1994) 4 SCC 602; see also Mohd Iqbal M. Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra, (1984) 4 SCC 494. (ii) Terrorism means the act of terrorising; unlawful acts of violence committed
Railway
come within the ambit of the definition of 'railway' in s. 3(4) of the Railway Act, Samuel Tippee v. State, AIR 1963 Ori 20. 'Railway' includes 'steamer' but a jetty with but a steamer is not part of
Pith and substance
6th Edn., Vol. C, p. 43; State of Rajasthan v. V.G. Chowla, AIR 1959 SC 544; Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1985 SC 845. Pith and Substance, is a doctrine relating to the interpretation of statutes; … the purpose of determining the true nature and character of the legislation in question, Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam, AIR 1961 SC 232 (256): (1961) 1 SCR 809.
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free