Skip to content

Nath - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act

cases falling under ss. 17 and 17-A which deal with cases 'otherwise expressly provided' in the Act, Sambhu Nath Sarkar v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1973 SC 1425: (1973) 1 SCC 856: (1974) 1 SCR 1.

Sadharaner

mean that which is common, there is no suggestion in that definition that the word means 'public', Jatindra Nath Borat v. Corporation of Calcutta, AIR 1931 Cal 433.

Subordinate

revisional jurisdiction or power of Superinten-dence given to it by some statutory provision over the former court, Bishambar Nath v. Achal Singh, AIR 1932 All 651: 1932 All LJ 816. Means administratively subordinate, i.e. some other public

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Transfer

a deity is looked into Court does not see why it cannot be called a gift, Kumar Pashupati Nath Mullah v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1974 SC 663 (664): (1974) 3 SCR 536: (1974) 1 SCC

Trademark

Trademark, includes a registered as well as unregistered trademark, State of Orissa v. Ram Nath, AIR 1972 SC 232: (1972) 1 SCC 130. Trademark, means a word, phrase, logo, or other graphic symbol

Trade Mark

a trade mark includes a registered as well as unregistered trade mark, State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ram Nath, (1972) 1 SCC 130: AIR 1972 SC 232. [Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, s. 2(1)(v)]

Till the next date of listing

meaning that the stay order has to continue till any subsequent order is passed by the Court, Shambhoo Nath Singh Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 1994 (23) All LR 32.

Substantive capacity

officiating or temporary capacity and would imply that the holder thereof had a lien on his post, Prem Nath Sharma v. Vice-Chancellor, Lucknow, University, AIR 1959 All 618. Substantive capacity, the emphasis imparted by the adjective 'substantive'

Substantial question of law

on any of the parties would not be regarded as substantial question of law, Pankaj Bhargava v. Mohinder Nath, AIR 1991 SC 1233 (1236): (1991) 1 SCC 556.

Subject thereto

enactment that the acts done or actions taken are deemed to have been done under the statute, Bishambhar Nath v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1966 SC 573 (579). [Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, s. 58(3)]

  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial