Mohan V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Money Bill
(per Gilbert C.B., Re Shelmer, 1725 Gilb Ch 200).' Seeds and Fertilizers, is property, but not money, Lalit Mohan v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2000 All 197. Money as currency, and not as medals, seems to me
Money
(per Gilbert C.B., Re Shelmer, 1725 Gilb Ch 200).' Seeds and Fertilizers, is property, but not money, Lalit Mohan v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2000 All 197. Money as currency, and not as medals, seems to me
Judicial service
State of Assam v. Kuseswar Saikia, AIR 1970 SC 1616 (1618): (1969) 3 SCC 505, See also Chandra Mohan v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1966 SC 1987 (1994).
Keep your definitions linked to case research
At any given time
time, the expression 'at any given time' means till that time when the results can be declared, Lalit Mohan Pandey v. Poorman Singh, (2004) 6 SCC 626 (664): AIR 2004 SC 2303. At any time, the expression
First hearing
framing of issues when the suit would be posted for production of evidence, Ved Prakash Wadhwa v. Vishwa Mohan, (1995) 3 SCC 407; Advaita Nand v. Judge, Small Cause Court, Meerut, (1983) 3 SCC 667.
Landing charges
charges cover the totality of all that an importer expends to bring imported goods to land, C. Chandra Mohan v. Sengottaiyan, (2000) 1 SCC 448. Means, the expenditure incurred by an importer for bringing goods on board ship
Amalgamation
or by one taking over the other. It has no precise legal meanings, Singer India Ltd. v. Chander Mohan Chandha, (2004) 7 SCC 1, [Halsbury' Laws of England, 4th Edn., Vol. 7, para 1539] Amalgamation is a
Other authorities
the territory of India, or under the control of the Government of India, Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal, AIR 1967 SC 1857 (1862): (1967) 3 SCR 377. (Constitution of India, Article 12) The expression 'other
The service
236] The expression 'the service' in Art. 233(2) of the Constitution of India means the judicial service, Chandra Mohan v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1966 SC 1287 (1994). [Constitution of India, Arts. 233(2), 234, 236]
Search and seizure
necessary concomitant of a welfare State. It tends to promote the well-being of the nation, Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1982 SC 33 (43). [Constitution of India, Artis. 162, 19(1)(g)(6) and 301]
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free