Merger - Law Dictionary Search Results

Appeal

the decree of the trial court, it would be again passing a decree of its own resulting in merger of decree of the trial court with that of the appellate court, Dilip v. Mohd. Azizul Haq, (2000)

reversion were satisfied on the1st January, 1926, and were also vested in the owner of the reversion, the merger is not to affect any protection which the owner of the reversion might have had if the term

Contingent remainder

Act, shall be deemed to have been capable of taking effect, notwithstanding the determination by forfeiture, surrender, or merger of any preceding estate of freehold, in the same manner, in all respects, as if such determination had

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Try free for 7 days See all features

Relating

'establish relation between'. In other words the provision of the Constitution in question must be linked with the merger Agree-ments or Covenants directly and immediately. It must have no independent existence. That is not the position under

Executory devise

8, which provided against failure upon premature determination of any preceding estate of freehold by forfeiture, surrender or merger, and the (English) Contingent Remainders Act, 1877 (40 & 41 Vict. c. 33), which provided that every contin-gent

Finder

Law Dict. An intermediary, who brings together parties for a business opportunity, such as two companies for a merger, Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edn., p. 46.

Joining together

Order, 1968, Para. 16(1)] There is nothing in the context to restrict its meaning to a case of merger of two or more political parties and their resultant extinction on formation of a new political party. It

Law

Law [fr. lage, lagea, or lah, Sax.; loi, Fr.; legge, Ital.; lex, fr. ligo, Lat., to bind], a rule of action to which men are obliged to make their conduct conformable. A command, enforced by some...

Pension

recognition of his past services is 'pension' within the meaning of clause 2 of Article VIII of the Merger Agreement, State of Gujarat v. Dr. R.B. Chandrachud, AIR 1971 SC 846 (853): (1969) 1 SCC 300: (1969)

Privy purse

of each of the rulers of former Indian States and their families in consideration of their agreement of merger in the Indian Union, A Commentary on the Constitution of India, Durga Das Basu, Vol. 4, p. 369.

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
Next ›
Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days