Kumar V This - Law Dictionary Search Results
Pass such order as it thinks fit
is satisfied that it is necessary to call for additional evidence, he may call for such evidence, Arbind Kumar Singh v. Nand Kishore Prasad, AIR 1968 SC 1227. The expression 'pass such order as it thinks fit'
Scheme
promised rate of interest may be in comparison with the agreed rate, State of West Bengal v. Swapan Kumar Guha, AIR 1982 SC 949 (953): (1982) 1 SCC 561: (1982) 3 SCR 121. Means a scheme inviting
Building
Cantonments Act, 2006, sec. 2(d). Means a residential or non-residential structure having a roof, Rizwan Akhtar v. Shrawan Kumar Bhatia, AIR 2007 (NOC) 431 (All).
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Precedent
down in an earlier Divi-sion Bench should refer the matter to a Full Bench, Ramashrey Roy v. Pashupati Kumar Pathak, AIR 1968 Pat 1. Precedents should be 'stepping-stones' and not 'halting places.' But a change in the
Law
his command which has to be obeyed by the citizens whether they agree with it or not, Raj Kumar Nursing Pratap Singh Deo v. State of Orissa, AIR 1964 SC 1793 (1797). It includes any Ordinance, order
Consideration
given or suffered by one for the act or promise of another, Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Shiv Kumar Joshi, (2000) 1 SCC 98. A valuable consideration in the sense of the law may consist either is
Actus curiae neminem gravabit.
(para 16); See Also CIT v. B. N. Bhattacharjee, (1979) 4 SCC 121: AIR 1979 SC 1725; Raj Kumar Dey v. Taropado Dey, (1987) 4 SCC 398; AIR 1987 SC 2195, Nand Kishore Morwah v. Samundri Devi,
Tenant
tenant under the Act will devolve on the heirs of the deceased tenant, Gian Devi Anand v. Jeevan Kumar, AIR 1985 SC 796: (1985) 2 SCC 683: (1985) Supp 1 SCR 1. Means any person by whom
Cruelty
adversely affecting the other. The cruelty may be mental or physical, international or unintentional, A. Jayachandra v. Aneel Kumar, (2005) 2 SCC 22 (29). [Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, s. 13(1)(1a)] The intentional and indicious infliction of mental
Election
to the declaration of the result under s. 66 of the Act, Election Commission of India v. Ashok Kumar, (2000) 8 SCC 216 (226). (Constitution of India, Art. 329) The word 'election' cannot be restricted only to
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free