Khan V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Habitual criminal
persistently and prima facie there should be a continuity in the commission of those offences, Ayub Pappubhan Navab Khan Pathan v. S.N. Sinha, AIR 1990 SC 2069 (2071): (1990) 4 SCC 552. [Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social
Ratio decidendi
to similar facts, Regional Manager v. Pawan Kumar Dubey, AIR 1976 SC 1766: (1976) 3 SCC 334; Jahangir Khan v. State of Bihar, (1998) 1 Pat LJR 912 (Pat). Ratio decidendi, the ground of a judicial decision. The
Reasonable requirement
impossible or extremely difficult for the landlord to get a decree for eviction, Bega Begum v. Abdul Ahad Khan, AIR 1979 SC 272 (276). [J&K Houses and Shops Rent Control Act (34 of 1966), s. 11(1)(h)] What
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Immediately
is to take place within relatively short-interval of time and without any other intervening recurrence, Rao Mahmood Ahmed Khan v. Ranbir Singh, 1995 Supp (4) SCC 275: AIR 1995 SC 2195 (2198). [U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reform
Requirement
Requirement, connotes that there should be an element of need, Bega Begum v. Abdul Ahad Khan, AIR 1979 SC 272. Requirement, coupled with the word reasonable means that it must be something more than
Upto
the ways permissible, there can be no complaint on the other side, Musharraf Hussain v. Agha Munawar Ali Khan, 186 IC 881: AIR 1940 Lah 7: 186 IC 881. Upto, Wednesday in a contract means that the
Public
or participated in or enjoyed by people at large, Otherwise, it is common to all the people, Azam Khan v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1972) 2 Andh WR 288: (1972) Mad LJ (Cr) 674. The word 'public' includes
Sanitation
Sanitation, includes leaving of open space in between a building and the road, Bashir Ahmad Khan v. State, (1972) ILR 2 All 340: (1972) All WR (HC) 620: (1972) All Cr Rep 396. The word
Sedition
into contempt; and the very tendency of sedition is to incite the people to insurrection and rebellion, Nazir Khan v. State of Delhi, (2003) 8 SCC 461 (488). [Indian Penal Code, s. 124A] Means speaking or writing of
Privy purse
which he has disposing power within the main part of s. 60(1), Code of Civil Procedure, Nawab Usmanali Khan v. Sagar Mal, AIR 1965 SC 1798 (1802): (1965) 3 SCR 207; see also Ragunandan Rao Ganpatrao v. Union
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free