Khan V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Actio personalis moritur cum persona.
and see LAW REFORM. --Kakumanu Pedasobhoyya v. Kakumanu Akkamma, 1959 SCR 1249 (para 15): See also Azmat Azim Khan v. Board of Revenue , (1972) 3 SCR 160: AIR 1971 SC 1429; M. S. Ezhuthasson v. T. G.
Confession
admission is evidence against its maker, if its admissibility is not excluded by some provision of law, Nazir Khan v. State of Delhi, (2003) 8 SCC 461. Includes a statement intended by the maker to be exculpatory or
Salary
or repayments to a provident fund, even though these may be recovered by deduction from his salary, Umar Khan v. Abdul Wahid Nafix Khalili, AIR 1943 Lah 60. 'Salary' means the total monthly emoluments, excluding any allowance declared
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Habitually
Prashant Raje v. Ganpatrao, (2000) 7 SCC 522. The expression 'habitually' would obviously mean repeatedly or persistently, Amanulla Khan etc v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1999 SC 2197 (2199). [Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act (16
Record
a memorial or remembrance. A file of papers connected with a suit or other, Specified Subject Abdul Rashid Khan v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 1961 All LJ 467. Means not only the impugned orders of judgments but all
Likely
Ram v. State of Haryana, AIR 2002 SC 3360 (3364): (2002) 7 SCC 691. See also Abdul Waheed Khan v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (2002) 7 SCC 175: AIR 2002 SC 2961. (Penal Code, 1860, s. 300 thirdly
Obscene
forbade to be expressed an 'obscene act' within the meaning of s. 294, Indian Penal Code; Zafar Ahmad Khan v. State, AIR 1963 All 105 (107). (Indian Penal Code, s. 294)
Wife
her under that s. is unaffected by the provisions of the personal law applicable to her, Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, AIR 1985 SC 945 (949): (1985) 2 SCC 556. [Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, s. 125(1),
Banking company
in the first place necessary that it must be a 'company', State Bank of Travancore v. Mohammed Mohammed Khan, AIR 1981 SC 1744: (1982) 1 SCR 338: (1981) 4 SCC 82 (88). does not include a foreign
Review
and cannot be entertained in the absence of a provision thereof, Major Chandra Bhan Singh v. Latafat Ullah Khan, AIR 1978 SC 1814 (1817): (1979) 1 SCC 321: (1978) 1 SCR 891. If there had been change
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free