J D - Law Dictionary Search Results
implied in law
imposed by law (as statutory or case law) [it contradicted an implied in law term of the writing "J. D. Calamari and J. M. Perillo"]
agreement
one to terms usually determined by negotiation [an must be sufficiently definite before a court can enforce it "J. D. Calamari and J. M. Perillo"] b : the language or instrument embodying such an expression [signed the ]
construction
construing, interpreting, or explaining meaning or effect (as of a statute or contract) [the placed upon an agreement "J. D. Calamari and J. M. Perillo"]
Keep your definitions linked to case research
subordinate
satisfaction of another [the equitable assignee will be subordinated to the rights of the assignor's trustee in bankruptcy "J. D. Calamari and J. M. Perillo"]
unconscionability
: the state or condition of being unconscionable [the issue of is to be decided by the court "J. D. Calamari and J. M. Perillo"] see also procedural unconscionability, substantive unconscionability 2 : a doctrine in contract law:
conveyance
2 : an instrument (as a deed) that conveys property rights (as title) [lack of delivery of a "J. D. Calamari and J. M. Perillo"]
offeror
makes an offer to another [acceptance of the offer terminates the power of revocation that the ordinarily has "J. D. Calamari and J. M. Perillo"]
in terrorem
or intended to threaten or intimidate [overbroad covenants not to compete which have in terrorem effect on employees "J. D. Calamari and J. M. Perillo"] NOTE: In terrorem is most commonly used to describe a condition in a
Public servant
s. 5 (2)] Public servant, includes not only the State and Central Government employees but also others like judge, juryman, assessor and arbitrator. It also includes every person in the service or pay of the government or … the managing committee of a muni-cipality is a 'public servant' within the meaning of the s. 2; Maharudrappa Danappa Kesarappanavar v. State of Mysore, AIR 1961 SC 785: (1962) 1 SCR 129. (ii) The Minister is a
Confession to a priest
Normanshaw v. Normanshaw, (1893) 69 LT 468; Wheeler v. Le Marchant, (1881) 17 Ch D 681; but some judges have disapproved of extorting such secrets [see, e.g., per Best, C.J., in Broad v. Pitt, (1828) 3 C&P
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free