Ipc V Los - Law Dictionary Search Results
Cruelty
(Cri) 461; See also Shanti v. State of Haryana, AIR 1991 SC 1226: (1991) 1 SCC 371. (Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 498A, Expln) Such conduct on the part of a husband or wife [see forth v.
Charge
the word as implying inculpation of a person for an alleged offence as used in s. 224 of IPC, Seher Singh v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 2004 SC 3030 (3038): (2004) 11 SCC 585. [Criminal Procedure
Deadly weapon
being cannot be considered as deadly weapon as per the description of deadly weapon enumerated under s. 326, IPC, Shakeel Ahmed v. State, (2004) 10 SCC 103. (Penal Code, 1860, s. 326).
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Obscene
may have arrived here and now, United States v. Kennerley, 209 F 119 (121) (S.D.N.Y. 1913). Obscene, the Indian Penal Code borrowed the word from the English Statute. The Common law offence of obscenity was established in
Bigamy
Second marriage of Hindu husband after his conversion to Islam is void marriage in terms of section 494, IPC. It is violative of justice, equity and good conscience. It would also be in violation of rules of … been known to such person to be living within that time; or even, as was held in Reg. v. Tolson, (1889) 23 QBD 168, by nine judges to five, to a person re-marrying within the seven years
Property
property only when it is used without any qualification in s. 405 or in other sections of the Indian Penal Code, R.K. Dalmia v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1962 SC 1821 (1833): (1963) 1 SCR 253. [Penal Code,
Larceny
The word larceny in English law contemplates permanent gain or loss and is different from 'theft' under the Indian Penal Code, K.N. Mehra v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1957 SC 369 (372). … or Roscoe's Crim. Evid. and Russell on Crimes. The word larceny in English law contemplates permanent gain or loss and is different from 'theft' under the Indian Penal Code, K.N. Mehra v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1957
Common object, common intention
an assembly to achieve that object, Chanda v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2004) 5 SCC 141 (147). (Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 149)
Obtain
will be a primary requisite for an offence u/s. 5(1)(d) of the Act unlike an offence u/s. 161 IPC; C.K. Damodaran Nair v. Govt. of India, AIR 1997 SC 551 (554): (1997) 9 SCC 477.
Valuable security
Expl. II; (English) Penal Code, 1860, s. 30] The assessment order is certainly a 'document', under s. 29, IPC. The order of assessment does create a right, in the assessee, in the sense that he has a … Valuable security, certificates the appellant has been found to have forged to get admission in the Arts and Commerce
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free