Immovable Property - Law Dictionary Search Results
vicinage
cause material injury to others (as by a nuisance) in the free exercise of rights of ownership in immovable property [these obligations of are legal servitudes imposed on the owner of property "Rodrigue v. Copeland, 475 So. 2d
Agreement to transfer
changed and also means that no person shall revoke or alter an agreement for the transfer of an immovable property or transfer such property in respect of which as statement has been furnished, DLF Universal Ltd. v. Appropriate
Allotment
grant by a person duly authorized in this behalf of a right of use or occupation of any immovable evacuee property to any other person, but does not include a grant by way of lease. [The Administration
Keep your definitions linked to case research
movable
mortgage) in an item of movable property [bonds and annuities are incorporeal s] often used in pl. compare immovable
Year to year
the 'British Calender' and not according to vernacular calendar. If this position is accepted, the lease deed of immovable property, from year to year, would become compulsorily registrable, if it is for a British calendar year, and not
Vicinage
cause material injury to others (as by a nuisance) in the free exercise of rights of ownership in immovable property, Rodnigue v. Copeland, 475 So 2d 1071 (1985).
Repatriation outside India
authorised dealer from which it can be converted in Foreign currency. [Foreign Exchange Management (Acquisition and Transfer of Immovable Property in India) Regulations, 2000, Reg. 2 (d)]
Remittance of asset
balance or superannuation benefits, amount of claim or maturity proceeds of Insurance policy, sale proceeds of shares, securities, immovable property or any other asset held in India in accordance with the provisions of the Act or rules or
Relinquishment of interest by partner
executing a deed of relinquishment in favour of other existing partners of the firm, having both movable and immovable properties, is not necessary, Nariman Aspandiar Irani v. Adi Merwan Irani, 1989 Bom 362. … a deed of relinquishment in favour of other existing partners of the firm, having both movable and immovable properties, is not necessary, Nariman Aspandiar Irani v. Adi Merwan Irani, 1989 Bom 362.
Relating to
that the defendant is threatening to illegally recover possession from the plaintiff-licensee. Suits for protecting such possession of immovable property against the alleged illegal attempts on the part of the dependant to forcibly recover such possession from the
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free