Illegalize - Law Dictionary Search Results
Trade dispute
is by the Trade Disputes and Trade Unions Act, 1927 [see s. 1 (1), (4)], declared to be illegal, and any such act shall not be deemed to be done in furtherance of a trade dispute. The
Relating to
take in their sweep any suit in which the grievance is made that the defendant is threatening to illegally recover possession from the plaintiff-licensee. Suits for protecting such possession of immovable property against the alleged illegal attempts
Relief
an election petition, or if no petition is on the record, to the High Court, under Corrupt and Illegal Practices Prevention Act, 1883 (46 & 47 Vict. c. 51), the application being usually to a Divisional Court;
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Taking and retaining
s. 180 of the Act in an independent and exclusive sense. The former referred to taking of possession illegally and the latter to taking of possession legally but subsequent retaining of it illegally, Bhinka v. Charan Singh,
Usury
part of the Clergy Discipline Act, 1892. 1. The landing of money with interest 2. Charging of an illegal rate of interest 3. An illegal high rate of interest, Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edn. See, further, MONEY-LENDERS
Void
a relative rather than an absolute meaning. It only conveys the Idea that the order is invalid or illegal. It can be avoided. There are degrees of invalidity, depending upon the gravity of the infirmity, as to
Black mail
protection from the devastations of the latter. It was in fact a species of insurance. This was rendered illegal by 43 Eliz. C. 13. The same practice prevailed in Scotland, where it was also illegal. Also rent
Condition
be implied bylaw according to the nature of the transaction. A peculiarity of conditions precedent is that an illegal or impossible condition will, as a rule and excepting bequests of personalty (Williams on Executors), avoid the obligation
Immoral contracts
because it is a specialty (see CONTRACT), and has not been made for an executory consideration of an illegal nature. A covenant to pay money in consideration of future cohabitation is void, though under seal, Ayerst v.
Auction
auctions (English) (Bidding Agreements) Act, 1927 (17 & 18 Geo. 5, c. 12), was designed to make it illegal for a dealer to give any consideration or reward to any person, whether a dealer or not, for
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free