Gopal V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Resignation
means to 'cease to hold' the office, or to 'loose hold of' the office, Union of India v. Gopal Chandra Misra, AIR 1978 SC 694: (1978) 2 SCC 301: (1978) 3 SCR 12. [Constitution of India, Art.
Assignment
of any property, real or personal, in possesson or in action, or of any estate or right therein', Gopal Saran v. Satyanarayan, AIR 1989 SC 1141 (1148): (1989) 3 SCC 56. [Rajsthan Premises Control of Rent and
Sale price
in case where such cost is separately charged and the expression 'purchase price' shall be construed accordingly, Shree Gopal Industries Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1971 SC 2054: (1971) 2 SCC 532. (ii) Under s. 4
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Malik or milkiyat
proprietary rights were not intended to be conferred, Sasiman Chowdhurain v. Shib Narain, 49 IA 25 (35); Ram Gopal v. Nand Lal, AIR 1951 SC 139 (141): 1950 SCR 766. Malik, The word 'Malik' imports full proprietary rights
Crime
of an act specifically forbidden by law, it may be an offence against morality or social order, T.K Gopal v. State of Karnataka, (2000) 6 SCC 168: AIR 2000 SC 1669 (1673).
Turnover
a dealer in respect of the sale or supply of goods in the carrying out of any contract, Gopal Industries Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1971 SC 2054: (1971) 2 SCC 532. The definition of 'turnover'
Bigamy
the first marriage is subsisting he commits the offence of bigamy. (S. 494 of Indian Penal Code 1860). Gopal Lal v. State of Rajasthan, (1979) 2 SCC 170: AIR 1979 SC 713: (1979) 2 SCR 1171. Second
Proof
SCC 753. Means evidence testimony, convincing token, means of conviction. Also, standard strength of spirituous liquids, see also Gopal Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1979 SC 387: 1979 (1) SCC 355.
Same transaction
or as cause and effect, or principal and subsidiary acts, so as to constitute one continuous act, Madan Gopal Dey v. State, AIR 1968 Cal 79. The expression 'same transaction' implies a community of action and continuity
Employee
'employee' in the act would include one who has been dismissed, Central Provinces Transport Service Ltd. v. Raghunath Gopal, AIR 1957 SC 104 (107). [C.P. and Berar Industrial Disputed Settlement Act, (23 of 1947), s. 2(10)] The
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free