Good Cause Sufficient Case Difference - Law Dictionary Search Results
Good cause, sufficient case Difference
Matched in: Term Good cause, sufficient case Difference
Replevin
cover the alleged rent or damage for which the distress is made, and the probable costs of the cause, conditioned to commence and prosecute an action of replevin in that court, a week from date, and to … that court, he must at the time of the replevying give security sufficient to cover the alleged rent or damage for which the distress is … to a judgment de retorno habendo. The technical difference between an avowry and cognizance was this: where … Replevin, a personal action to recover possession in specie of goods unlawfully taken (generally, but not exclusively, applicable to the taking of goods distrained for rent), by contesting the … taking, or against both. Whatever may be distrained may be replevied. In cases of distress for rent the replevy should be made before the expiration
Abatement
slow progress of the ordinary forms of justice. (3) Plea in Abatement.-A defence by which a defendant showed cause to the Court why he should not be sued, or, if sued, not in the form adopted by … When there are specific and pecuniary legacies, and the assets are not sufficient to pay both, the specific have the preference, and only abate in … to express the deduction that is occasionally made at the Custom House from the duties chargeable upon such goods as are damaged, and for a loss in warehouses. (7) A badge in coat-armour, indicating dishonour of some … Criminal Law Act, 1826 (7 Geo. 4, c. 64), s. 19, in case of misnomer the judge may amend the indictment or information, and call … by the unlawful intervention of a stranger. Abatement differs from intrusion, in that it is always to
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Possession
In regard to real property a mere right without possession is not sufficient to found an action for trespass, for instance, until 1926 a lessee … with the popular sense. It may not always be synonymous with manual detention or physical retention of the goods or moneys, C.I.T. v. Tarsem Kumar, AIR 1986 SC 1477: (1986) 3 SCC 489: (1986) 3 SCR 294. … by the same acts, he may sue for the damage done to his interest, but not on the causes of action referred to. Under the Law of Property Act, 1925, s. 205 (1) (xix.): 'Possession' includes the … one of the tests of physical or de facto possession. In the case of possession through agent, it is true that the legal possession would … precise definition. Possession of a house is essentially different from possession of a gold watch. One has
interest
to a breached contract in receiving the benefit of the bargain by being put in a position as good as that which would have resulted had the contract been performed called also expectancy interest compare reliance interest … a future event compare vested interest in this entry controlling interest : sufficient stock ownership in a corporation to exert control over policy equitable interest … Latin, from Latin, to be between, make a difference, concern, from inter- between, among + esse to … royalty 2 : a specific concern or level of involvement (as financial involvement) esp. that warrants recognition or causes bias [had a right to intervene because of an in the litigation] [recused himself due to an in … the destructibility of contingent remainders set forth in the rule in Shelley's case. expectation interest : the interest of a party to a breached contract
Limitation of actions and prosecutions
1874] As a rule a title by possession for the statutory period of land against trustees will be good against all persons claiming as cestui que trustent under their trust (see Williams v. Papworth, 1900 AC 563), … the period of limitation for actions of debt by deed or upon recognizance is twenty years after the cause of action has accrued, except in the case of mortgage debts which are now barred after twelve years, … statutory period will revive it. No verbal acknowledgment of a debt is sufficient to prevent the operation of the statutes, Benest v. Pipon, (1829) Knapp's … in cases where the legal and equitable titles to demands correspond, and differ only in the Court where the right happens to be enforced, Stackhouse
Deed
sufficient, is an open question. See Chitty on Contracts, 15th Edn. At pp. 89, 90, citing Cooch v. Goodman, (1842) 2 QB 580, and other authorities. A deed executed after 1925 must be signed. [(English) Law of … possessing the external and internal circumstances necessary to its validity, yet it may be rendered invalid from many causes, which may be thus classified:- (I.) Those making it void ab initio, when it can never take effect; … generally placed in the last or peroration-clause in a deed-poll. In any case, even if there be no date, or an impossible date, the deed … Act, 1925, s. 56 (2), made between two or more persons in different interests, or a deed-poll (charta de una parte) made by a single
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
Try the research workspace - 7 days free