Did you mean: disturbed?
Disturber - Law Dictionary Search Results
Way
the necessity which created it; and when such necessity ceases, the right of way also ceases. See EASEMENTS. Disturbance of way happens when a person, who has a right of way over another's grounds, by grant or
Market
& 11 Vict. c. 14); (English) Markets and Fairs (Weighing of Cattle) Acts, 1886 to 1926. As to disturbance of market, see Goldsmid v. Great Eastern Railway Co., (1884) 9 App Cas 927; A.G. v. Horner (No.
Terrorism
under the ordinary penal law of the land and its main objective is to overawe the Government to disturb harmony of the society or 'terrorise' people and the society and not only those directly assaulted, with a
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Sedition
comprehensive term, and it embraces all those practices, whether by word, deed, or writing, which are calculated to disturb the tranquility of the State, and lead ignorant persons to endeavour to subvert the Government and laws of
Riot
Riot, a tumultuous disturbance of the peace by three persons or more assembling of their own authority, with an intent mutually to
Public disorder
Public disorder, is wide enough to cover a small riot an affray and other cases where peace is disturbed by or affects a small group of persons, Brij Bhushan v. State of Delhi, AIR 1950 SC 129:
Place of residence
displaced from the latter residence because of the setting up of the Dominions or on account of civil disturbances or fear of such disturbances, Sukh Lal v. State Bank of India, AIR 1967 SC 543 (546): (1967)
Quare impedit
quare impedit is abolished by s. 3 (5) of the (English) Benefices Act, 1898. Quare impedit, commands the disturbers, the bishop, the pseudo-patron, and his clerk, to permit the plaintiff to present a proper person (without specifying
Manor
or lordship. [(English) L.P. Act, 1925, s. 205 (1) (ix)] The (English) land legislation of 1925 has not disturbed the property in fee simple or many valuable rights which are or may be incident to a manor,
Acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the State
mischief by fire on any property of the Government or educational institution where the commission of such mischief disturbs or is likely to disturb public order, Keshab Roy v. State of West Bengal (1973) 3 SCC 216:
Try the research workspace - 7 days free