Skip to content

Corps - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

McDonnell Douglas test

a pretext for discrimination and that discrimination was the real reason for the employment action, Mc Donnell Douglas Corp v. Green, 411 US 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817 (1973); Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edn., p. 994.

Merrill doctrine

doctrine, the principal that the government cannot be estopped from disavowing an agent's unauthorised act, Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. Meerrill, 332 US 380, 68 S.Ct 1 (1947); Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edn., p. 1004.

Per quod

have been maintainable. means on the basis of or with reference to extrinsic circumstances, Kolegas v. Heftel Broadcasting Corp., 607 NE 2d 201 (1992).

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Possession

of a gold watch. One has to look at the property possessed, Bank View Mill Ltd. v. Nelson Corp. etc. Ltd., (1942) 2 All ER 477. Possession, is an ambiguous term. The law books divide its concept

Public Authorities, Protection of

rem (The Burns, 1907, P. 137); or if the cause of action alleged is fraud, Pearson v. Dublin Corporation, 1907 AC 351, or if there is a continuance of the injury or damage, Hague v. Doncaster Rural

Redeem

a mortgage debt after default but prior to a foreclosure becoming effective, Bowery Sav Bank v. Harbert Offset Corp., 558 NYS 2d 821 (1990).

Any surety

who has given some security but also one who has given only a personal guarantee, Maharashtra State Financial Corp. v. Jaycee Drugs and Pharmaceuticals (P) Ltd, (1991) 2 SCC 637 (653). [State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, s.

Severalty

ownership; one's own right without a joint interest in another person, Pacific Enterprises Oil Co. v. Pacific Petroleum Corp., 614 So 2d 409 (1993).

Approval and permission

obtained. But permission subsequently granted may validate the previous Act, Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Friendly Corp. Housing Society Ltd., (1995) Supp (3) SCC 456 (458): AIR 1996 SC 114 (115). [U.P. Urban Planning and

procedural law

federal courts in diversity actions must apply state substantive law and federal procedural law "Miller v. American Dredging Corp., 595 So. 2d 615 (1992)"] ;also : a particular law of this nature compare substantive law

  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial