Skip to content

Conceptibility - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Under is obvious

to have same meaning as the word 'of' which may bring in the notion of ownership. Indeed the concept of under can be relevant only when there are two entities one of which may be under the

Undertaking

term 'undertaking' is not defined in the Act. The relevant provisions use the term 'industry'. Undertaking is a concept narrower than industry. An undertaking may be a part of the whole, that is, the industry. It carries

Usage

whereas a custom may in some cases (e.g., the custom of gavelkind) be judicially noticed without proof. The concept of long continuance and passage of time is inbuilt in the expression 'usage', Commissioner H.R.E.C.E. Admn. v. Vedantna

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Reification

Reification, means mental conversion of an abstract concept into a material thing, Black's Law Diction-ary, 7th Edn., p. 1290.

Reference

a named arbitrator or arbitrators, while the expression 'arbitration agreement' is wider as it combines within itself two concepts, (a) a bare agreement between the parties that disputes arising between them should be decided or resolved through

Net-worth

and free reserves. [Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (1 of 1986), s. 3 (1) (ga)] The concept of 'Net Worth' always denotes the excess of the book value of all assets over liabilities and market

Prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue

Prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, regarded as involving a conception of acts or orders which are subversive of the administration of revenue. There must be some grievous error

Normal labour or normal delivery

Normal labour or normal delivery, means series of process by which the nature products of conception are expelled from the another's body and during which no artificial means are used, Mahendra v. Sushila, AIR

Obscene

State of Maharashtra, AIR 1965 SC 881 (887): (1965) 1 SCR 65. (Indian Penal Code, s. 292) The concept of obscenity would differ from country to country depending on the standards of morals of contemporary society. But

Owner

is essentially one of the 'better right' to be in possession and obtain it, whereas with chattels the concept is a more absolute one. Actual possession implies a right to retain it until the contrary is proved

  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial