Coking - Law Dictionary Search Results
Coal mine
is semantically sweeping and is wide in meaning so as to spare no class of coal, including even coking coal, because coking coal is a species of coal, coal itself being the genus. A definition of 'coal
Managing contractor
writing of the State Govern-ment has entered into an arrangement, contract or understanding, with the owner of a coking coal mine or coke oven plant under which the operations of the coking coal mine or coke oven
Shelley's case, Rule in
is the antique feudal doctrine generally known as the rule in Shelley's Case, which is reported by Lord Coke in 1 Rep. 93 b (23 Eliz. in C.B.), and elaborately examined by Lord Macnaghten in Van Grutten
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Jews
Jeuerie (Statutes of the Realm, vol. 1., p. 221), of uncertain date, but probably passed in 1375 (though? Coke put the date at 1390), which prohibited usury by Jews and compelled them to wear a distinctive dress,
Coke and coal
by indirect heating in beehive ovens and by-product ovens which are commonly known as 'coke oven plants', Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. Steel Abrasers and Allied Products Ltd., 1994 Supp (3) SCC 361 (362) [Colliery Control Order,
Status quo
connotation, the term 'Status Quo' implies the existing state of things at any given point of time, Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. State of Bihar, AIR 1988 SC 127: (1988) 1 SCR 869. The situation that currently
Cock oven plant
plant, whether within its premises or outside. (S. 3(b) of the Cooking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972, Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. Shri Parmeshwar Kumar Agarwala, (1979) 3 SCC 609 (610).
Slurry
coal slurry, depending upon the character or quality of the mixture of mineral in the liquid form, Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. State of Bihar, (1990) 4 SCC 557 (568). See also AIR 1964 Mad 115 (117).
Conservation
of slurry or collection of coal particles after the water content of slurry is soaked by soil, Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. State of Bihar, (1990) 4 SCC 557 (572). [Mines and Minerals, (Regulation and Development) Act,
Hybrid award
the court can interfere if there is an error apparent on the face of the award itself, Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. .K. Ahuja and Co., IR 2001 SC 1179 (1182): (2001) 4 SCC 86.
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free