Co V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Royalty
In its secondary sense, the word 'royalty' would signify, as in mining leases, that part of the reddendum, variable thought, payable in cash or kind, for rights and privileges obtained, Inderjeet Singh Sial v. Karam Chand Thapar, … the equivalent or translation of jura 'regalia' or 'jura regia'. Royal rights and prerogatives of a sovereign are covered thereunder. In its secondary sense, the word 'royalty' would signify, as in mining leases, that part of the
Toll
any passenger, animal, carriage, goods, merchandise, articles, matters or things conveyed on the railway.' See Railway and Hunt v. Great Northern Railway Co., (1851) 10 CB 900. County Courts have no jurisdiction over tolls. [(English) County Courts … Wm. 4, c. 27), s. 39. 1. A sum of money paid for use of something esp. The consideration paid to use a public road, highway, or bridge 2. A charge for a long call distance, Black's
Crossed cheques
if the customer had notitle. As to the effect of adding the words 'a/c Payee,' see House Property Co. v. L.C. & W. Bank, (1915) 31 TLR 479. See also Bills of Exchange Act (1882) Amendment Act,1932 (22
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Volenti non fit injuria
Watson in Smith v. Baker, 1891, AC (355). The question is one for the jury, Dublin, etc., Railway Co. v. Slattery, (1878) 3 App Cas 1155. For a recent application of the maxim, see Herd v. Weardale, etc.,
Any person
person, the effect of the 1994 amendment on s. 147 is unambiguous. Where earlier, the words 'any person' could be held not to include the owner of the goods or his authorised representative travelling in the goods … be held not to include the owner of the goods or his authorised representative travelling in the goods vehicle, Parliament has now made it clear that such a construction is no longer possible. The scope of this
Market
(Weighing of Cattle) Acts, 1886 to 1926. As to disturbance of market, see Goldsmid v. Great Eastern Railway Co., (1884) 9 App Cas 927; A.G. v. Horner (No. 2), (1913) 2 Ch 140. In City of London
Warranty
any agreement either accompanying a transfer of property, or collateral to the contract for such transfer, see Lawrence v. Cassell, (1930) 2 KB 83, and Miller v. Cannon Hill Estates Ltd., (1931) 2 KB 113, or to … Warranty, a guarantee or security; formerly a promise or covenant by deed by the bargainer, for himself and his heirs, to warrant and secure the bargainee and his
Possibility on a possibility
contract bet-ween the party offering and the party accepting as soon as it is posted, Household Fire Insurance Co. v. Grant, (1879) 4 Ex D 216, but a revocation of an offer is of no effect until brought
Debenture
to owe] may be defined generally as a charge in writing [not necessarily sealed, see British India, etc., Co. v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue, (1881) 7 QBD 165] of certain pro-perty with the repayment at a time fixed
Water and watercourse
Water and watercourse. In the language of the law the term 'land' includes water, 2 Bl. Com. 18. An action cannot be brought to recover possession of a pool or other piece of water by … water rates. By s. 68 of the Act of 1863 these rates are payable according to the annual value of the tenement supplied with water. London.-The (English) Metropolis Water Act, 1902 (2 Edw. 7, c. 41), and
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free