Co V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Negligence
is also a peculiar duty to take precaution in the case of dangerous Articles, see Dominion Natural Gas Co. v. Collins, 1909 AC 640. This case should be distinguished from the principle in Fletcher v. Rylands, LR 3
Railway
the Great Northern Railway Company and that of the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company (see Lancashire and Yorkshire Co. v. Gidlow, LR 7 HL 517), compel companies to provide locomotive power, etc. ss. 92 and 108 of the … carriages properly constructed,' etc., but this right will not be enforced by mandatory injunction, Powell Duffryn Steam Coal Co. v. Taff Vale Ry. Co., (1874) LR 9 Ch 331. The powers of railway companies to charge for conveyance
Undertaking
v. Management of Indian Standards Institution, AIR 1976 SC 145: (1975) 2 SCC 847: (1976) 2 SCR 138. (v) The expression 'undertaking' is not defined in the Act. It finds its place in the definition of the expression … 2 Mad LJ (SC) 6: 15 Fac LR 411: 16 Law Rep 140. Undertaking, denotes, with reference to company law, all the assets of the company past present and future, and is a mortgageable interest being commonly
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Goodwill
of business or its name or style, everything connected with or carrying the benefit of the business, Ramnik Vallabhdas Madhwani v. Taraben Pravinlal Madhwani, (2004) 1 SCC 407: AIR 2004 SC 1084 (Partnership Act, 1932, s. 55). … Goodwill, may be the whole advantage belonging to the firm, its reputation as also connection thereof. It, thus, means that every affirmative advantage as contrasted with negative advantage that has been acquired in
Processing
the commodity must, as a result of the operation, experience some change' (See Chowgule & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, 1981 (1) SCC 653: AIR 1981 SC 1014). In a cold storage, vegetables, fruits and … Processing, in common parlance 'processing' is understood as an action which brings forth some change or alteration of the goods or
Author
personal one and is not assignable, Griffith v. Tower Publishing Co., (1897) 1 Ch 21. See Nisbet & Co. v. Golf Agency, (1907) 23 TLR 370, and Evans v. Hulton & Co., (1924) 121 LT 534. Means-(i) in
Control
or influence. Control is intended to regulate and hold in check a restrain from action, State of Mysore v. Allum Karibasuppa, AIR 1974 SC 1863 (1866). [Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, (11 of 1959), s. 54] The word … Control, the word 'control' suggests check, restraint or influence. Control is intended to regulate and hold in check a
Business
It has no definite meaning. Its perceptions differ from private to public sector or from institutional financing to commercial banking, Mahesh Chandra v. Regional Manager Uttar Pradesh Financial Corpn., AIR 1993 SC 935 (939): (1993) 2 SCC
Contribution
Contribution, to any fund shall not include any sums in repayment of loan. [Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), … must also be given its due meaning. It cannot be understood as donations. If that be so, a voluntary contribution cannot amount to a compulsive donation. If the donor, in order to gain an advantage or benefit,
Land
Land, in its restrained sense, means soil, but in its legal acceptation it is a generic term, comprehend-ing every species of ground, soil or earth, whatso-ever, as meadows, pastures, woods, moors, waters, marshes, furze and heath; … whether or not held apart from the surface, buildings or parts of buildings (whether the division is horizontal, vertical or made in any other way), and other corporeal hereditaments; also a manor, an advowson, and a rent
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free