Bridge Bank - Law Dictionary Search Results
bridge bank
Matched in: Term bridge bank
bank
Matched in: Term bank
Charities, or Public Trusts
Durham, (1904) 9 Ves 399 (406); Re Dovidson, (1909) 1 Ch 667, and see A.-G. v. National provincial Bank, 1924 AC 262; and Verge v. Somerville, 1924 AC 496; if there is any option in the matter, … maintenance of sick and maimed soldiers and mariners, schools of learning, free schools, and scholars of universities; repairsof bridges, ports, havens, causeways, churches, sea-banks, and highways; education and preferment of orphans; the relief, stock, or maintenance of
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Magna Carta
the famous meadow called Runingmede, or Runemede (from the Saxon word rune, signifying council), situated on the southwest bank of the Thames, between Staines and Windsor, in Surrey, was selected for the interview. The conferences between the … his land, as carts, and implements of husbandry. The 15th and 16th chapters relate to the making of bridges and defending of river-banks, a subject which now forms part of local law. The 17th chapter enacts that:-'No
Finder of goods
the finder to the shopkeeper to advertise them, may be recovered from the shopkeeper by the finder, see Bridges v. Hawkesworth, (1851) 21 LJ QB 75, where a bundle of bank notes so found was recovered. The
Bridge
Matched in: Term Bridge
Injunction
or at suit of a private person immediately grieved by them, may be enumerated obstructions to highways and bridges, public rivers and harbours, and everything that renders the enjoyment of life and property hazardous and uncomfortable. In … blocking up of water-courses, diversion of streams from mills, the back flowage on mills, pulling down of the banks of rivers and exposing adjacent lands to inundation, or neighbouring mills to destruction, etc. The piracy of a
Negligence
compensated under this Sub-s. must cause some loss or injury to him, Consumer Unity & Trust Society v. Bank of Baroda, (1995) 2 SCC 150 (153). (ii) 'Negligence' is the omission to do something which a reasonable … a prudent and reasonable man would not do, [See Blyth v. Birmingham Waterworks Co., (1856) 11 Exch 781: Bridges v. Directors etc. of N.L. Ry. (1873-74) HL 213; Governor-General in Council v. Mt. Saliman, (1949) ILR 27
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
Try the research workspace - 7 days free