Skip to content

Air 1946 Pc 3 - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Church Discipline Act (English)

exist scandal or offence against the said laws' (whether concerning doctrine, see Voysey v. Noble, (1870) LR 3 PC 357; Bishop of St. Albans v. Fillingham, 1906 p. 163), ritual or moral misconduct), first by inquiry before

Workman

nature of duties attached to his office, All India Reserve Bank Employees' Association v. Reserve Bank of India, AIR 1966 SC 305: (1966) 1 SCR 25. The term 'workman' as used in s. 33C(2) includes all persons … attached to his office, All India Reserve Bank Employees' Association v. Reserve Bank of India, AIR 1966 SC 305: (1966) 1 SCR 25. The term 'workman' as used in s. 33C(2) includes all persons whose claim, requiring

Articles of religion

by him were inconsistent with their clear construction or repugnant to it, Voysey v. Noble, (1871) LR 3 PC 357].

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Heresy

the Church Discipline Act as an offence against the laws ecclesiastical, see Noble v. Voysey, (1871) LR 3 PC 357, in which the Rev. Charles Voysey was deprived of his benefice for contradicting many doctrines set forth

Prathista

Prathista, means consecration, Rama Rao v. Venkata Ratnam, AIR 1947 PC 88: 230 IC 438: 1947 All LJ 365: 1947 All WR (PC) 25: 1947 Mad LJ … Prathista, means consecration, Rama Rao v. Venkata Ratnam, AIR 1947 PC 88: 230 IC 438: 1947 All LJ 365: 1947 All WR (PC) 25: 1947 Mad LJ 400: (1947) Mad WN 240 (PC). Consecration or setting up

Succession to this office

the trustee has a beneficial interest of some sort or not. (See Ganesh Chander Dhur v. Lal Behari, AIR 1936 PC 318: 71 MLJ 740 and Bhabatatini v. Ashalata, AIR 1943 PC 89: 46 BLR 212) Ordinarily … a beneficial interest of some sort or not. (See Ganesh Chander Dhur v. Lal Behari, AIR 1936 PC 318: 71 MLJ 740 and Bhabatatini v. Ashalata, AIR 1943 PC 89: 46 BLR 212) Ordinarily a Shebaitship or

Devolution issue

1(b) of Schedule 6 to the Act of 1998 (Scetland Act, 1998), Hoekstra v. H.M. Advocate (PC), (2000) 3 WLR 1817. May well arise in advance of or every porsibility in the course of a criminal trial

Material witness

of the facts on which the prosecution relied. (AIR 1936 PC 289 relied), Narain v. State of Punjab, AIR 1959 SC 484 (487): 1959 Supp (1) SCR 724. [Criminal PC (5 of 1898), s. 208] The Court … person present if his evidence appears to be essential for the just decision of the case (CrPC, s. 311).

Fact discovered

they do not relate to the discovery of the knife in the house of the informant. AIR 1947 PC 67 followed, Mohd. Inayatullah v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1976 SC 483 (485): (1976) 1 SCC 828. [Evidence … it is produced and the knowledge of the accused as to this, Prabhoo v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1963 SC 1113 (1115). [Evidence Act 1872 (1 of 1872), s. 27] It is fallacious to treat the

Lineal descendant

is wide enough to include all descendants, male and female, Bhimnath Missir v. Sm. Tara Dai, AIR 1929 PC 162. The terms 'lineal consanguinity' and 'lineal descent' have been defined in Whartoris Law Lenicon, 14th Edn., Second … of the remotest degree. There cannot be any other meaning of this word, Sunderlal Chourasiya v. Jejila Chourasiya, AIR 2004 MP 138. [see Hindu Succession Act 30 of 1956, s. 8; Succession Act 39 of 1925, ss. … Chourasiya v. Jejila Chourasiya, AIR 2004 MP 138. [see Hindu Succession Act 30 of 1956, s. 8; Succession Act 39 of 1925, ss. 107, 109]

  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial