A V Thomas - Law Dictionary Search Results
Any other sufficient reason
reason, means a reason sufficient on grounds at least analogous to those specified in the rule, Lily Thomas v. Union of India, (2000) 6 SCC 2243; Chajju Ram v. Neki, AIR 1922 PC 112: 49 IA 144.
Confer 'conferment'
the expression 'confer' is pointer to something done overtly and explicitly, P. John Chandy & Co. (P) Ltd. v. John P. Thomas, (2002) 5 SCC 90.
Criticism, comment
picture submitted for public approval. As to when criticism is fair and honest and no libel, see Joynt v. Cycle Trade Publishing Co., (1904) 2 KB 292; Thomas v. Bradbury, Agnew & Co. Ltd., (1906) 2 KB
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Del credere
Such a factor is called a del creder agent; as to his position, see Thomas Gabriet & Sons v. Churchill & Sim, (1914) 3 KB 1272. He is a mere surety, liable only to his principal in
Form
unless made 'in accordance with' the form in the schedule to the Bills of Sale Act, 1882; see Thomas v. Kelly, (1888) 13 Ap. Cas. 506. Intended to connote that the body of the company or its … the Law of Property Act, 1925), are usually permissive, but a bill of sale (see that title) is void unless made 'in accordance with' the form in the schedule to the Bills of Sale Act, 1882; see
Malfesance, misfeasance, nonfeasance
misfeasance would apply to a case where a lawful act is done in an improper manner, Khairul Bashar v. Thomas Lal, AIR 1957 All 553 (556). (Limitation Act, 1908, Art. 36)
Time being
which will arise in the future and which may (and probably will) vary from time to time, Ellison v. Thomas, 31 LJ Ch 867.
Alias (dictus)
has been styled or has styled himself by more names than one, as in the case of Reg. v. Thomas Castro, otherwise Arthur Orton, otherwise Sir Roger Charles Doughty Tichborne, Baronet, (1873) LR 9 QB 219.
Dispose
Dispose, transfer or alienate, Dy. C.S.T. v. Thomas Stephen & Co., (1988) 2 SCC 264: AIR 1988 SC 997: (1988) 3 SCR 248.
Chance, Game of
machine whereby the element of chance is added to the element of matching one horse against another-in Tollett v. Thomas, (1871) LR 6 QB 514. And see GAMING; LOTTERY.
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free