5 3 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Any mistake apparent from record
not, the error cannot be described as an error apparent on the face of record, M. Ahammedkutty Haji v. Tahasildar Kozhikode, Kerala, (2005) 3 SCC 351. Means an error can be said to be an error apparent
Caveat viator
274, Latham v. Johnson, 1913 (1) KB 398, and Norman v. Great Western Railway Company, 1915 (1) KB 584 (2) CP 311. The case of a trespasser is quite different, but even then the owner of the … visitor or licensee. See Indermaur v. Dames, (1866) LR 1 CP 274, Latham v. Johnson, 1913 (1) KB 398, and Norman v. Great Western Railway Company, 1915 (1) KB 584 (2) CP 311. The case of a
Dowry
ceremonies are prevalent in different societies. Such payments are not enveloped within the ambit of 'dowry', Satvir Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 2001 SC 2828 (2834): (2001) 8 SCC 633. [Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of … which the wife brings the husband in marriage. This word should not be confounded with dower, Co. Litt. 31. Means any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given either directly or indirectly-- by one
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Husband
introducing those provisions [Indian Penal Code, 1860, ss. 498A and 304B; Evidence Act, 1872, s. 113B], Reema Aggarwal v. Anupam, (2004) 3 SCC 199.
Infant
to apply, and infants may be permitted to use personal chattels which form part of the estate. The 5th s. of the (English) Betting and Loans (Infants) Act, 1892 (55 & 56 Vict. c. 4), follows the … or avoid when he comes of age; as a conveyance of lands, a promissory note, an account stated. 3rd. Those which are binding ab initio and need on ratification: such as contracts for the public service, Articles
Peculiar
wherein, by ancient compositions, the bishops have parted with their jurisdiction as ordinaries to these corporations. See Parham v. Templer, (1820) 3 Phill Ec Rep P. 245; Tomlins' Law Dict.
Poison
Act, 1908. This in turn was repealed by the Pharmacy and Poisons Act, 1933 (23 & 24 Geo. 5, c. 25), which setup a Poisons Board to prepare and submit a list of substances to be treated … other persons is admissible against the prisoner, Reg. v. Geering, (1849) 18 LJMC 215; Rex v. Armstrong, (1922) 38 TLR 631; as also of antecedent poisoning, Reg. v. Garner, (1863) 3 F&F 681. Unlawful and malicious administering
Fellow - servant
a master is not liable to his servant for injury caused by the negligence of a fellow-servant, Priestly v. Fowler, (1837) 3 M. & W. 1, but this state of the law was altered by the (English)
Accounts, falsification of
7. Falsification of accounts may amount to forgery within the (English) Forgery Act, 1913 (3 & 4 Geo. 5, c. 27) [Re Arton, 1896 (1) QB 509]. The falsification of a mechanical means of recording an account,
Controller
every Additional, Deputy or Assistant Controller who may be authorised by the Controller under sub-s. (3) of s. 5 to exercise any power under this Act. [Dangerous Machines (Regulation) Act, 1983 (35 of 1983), s. 3 (b)]
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free