32 A - Law Dictionary Search Results
Protector of the settlement
that title). Under the (English) Fines and Recoveries Act, 1833 (3 & 4 Will. 4, c. 74), s. 32, the settlor might appoint a special protector. In the absence of this 'special' protector, the statutory protector, i.e.,
Pretensed right
is said to be in him who so claims and sues, Mod. Cas. 302. By s. 2 of 32 Hen. 8, c. 9, no one might sell or purchase any title to land, unless the vendor had
Partition
partition by 31 Hen. 8, c. 1 (the Preamble of which sets forth the disadvantages of co-ownership), and 32 Hen. 8, c. 32, the latter Act applying to joint tenants and tenants in common holding for life
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Necessaries
school or is supported by him: see Co. Litt. 172 a; Ryder v. Wombwell, (1868) LR 4 Ex. 32; Barnes v. Toye, (1884) 13 QBD 410; Roberts v. Gray, (1913)1 KB 520; and INFANT. Where 'necessaries,' that
Marriage
of either party. In case of license, the Act of 1823 requires fifteen days' residence, Tuckniss v. Alexander, 32 LJ Ch 794. It is only if both parties have concurred in falsifying the names in the banns
Plant
dictionary meaning. This is certainly true for plant, I.R.C. v. Scottish & Newcastle Breweries Ltd., (1982) 1 WLR 322: (1982) 2 All ER 230: 55 TC 252 (HL). Plant, in the relevant sense, although admitted not a
Khatauni
Khatauni, khatauni is an annual register prepared under s. 32 of the Land Revenue Act, 1951. Bachan v. Kankar AIR 1972 SC 2157: (1972) 2 SCC 555: (1973)
Fairs
by usage, or under the (English) Fairs Act, 1873 (36 & 37 Vict. c. 37) (repealing 31 & 32 Vict. c. 51), by the Secretary of State. See the (English) Markets and Fairs Clauses Act (10 &
Joint-stock Banks
date of their incorporation, by charter, or by 7 Geo. 4, c. 46; 7 & 8 Vict. cc. 32 and 113; 9 & 10 Vict. c. 45 (in Scotland and Ireland); 20 & 21 Vict. cc. 49
Apportionment
(1882) 10 QBD 48. Covenants if implied by law were apportionable but express covenants were not, until the 32 Hen. 8, c. 34, see Twynam v. Pickard, 2 B&Ald 105, and Swansea Corporation v. Thomas ubi supra.
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free