3 1 - Law Dictionary Search Results
P.P.I
P.P.I. See POLICY PROOF OF INTEREST.
Testamentum, i.e. testatio mentis, facta nullo pr'sentis metu periculi, sed sol' cogitatione mortalitatis
Testamentum, i.e. testatio mentis, facta nullo pr'sentis metu periculi, sed sol' cogitatione mortalitatis. Co. Litt. 322 b.-(A testament, that is, the witnessing of the mind, made not in fear of present danger, but only … Testamentum, i.e. testatio mentis, facta nullo pr'sentis metu periculi, sed sol' cogitatione mortalitatis. Co. Litt. 322 b.-(A testament, that is,
Zur-i-peshagi lease (Zurpeshgidars)
security for the amount advanced by the tenant to the lessor, Chulhan Singh v. Madho Singh, 28 IC 383.
Keep your definitions linked to case research
C.I.F.
C.I.F. cost, insurance, and freight
Up to October 1, 1984
include appointments made on October 1, 1984, Union of India v. Gayan Prakash Singh, 1994 Supp (1) SCC 306 (309).
Policy Proof of Interest (P.P.I.) (English)
interest. Such a policy in the absence of an insur-able interest is made void by the Gaming Act, 1845. The Marine Insurance Act, 1906 (s. 4), specifically declares such policies void. The Marine Insurance (Gambling Policies) Act,
Testimaignes ne potent testifie le negative, mes I affirmative
Testimaignes ne potent testifie le negative, mes I affirmative, witness cannot testify to a negative; they must testify to an affirmative
Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions of sub-s. (1)
not intended to cut down the generality of the meaning of the preceding provision, King-Emperor v. Sibnath Banerji, 1945 FCR 195: AIR 1945 PC 156; Shiv Kirpal Singh v. V.V. Giri, AIR 1970 SC 2097 (2112): (1970)
Notwithstanding, the words 'notwithstanding' in clause (1) and 'subject to' in clause (3) mean that where an entry is in general terms in List II and part of that entry is in specific terms in List I, the entry in List I takes effect notwithstanding the e
not stand in the way of giving full effect to the retrospective introduction of the proviso in s. 3 and applying the provisions of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 in cases falling within the proviso, Sunder … retrospective introduction of the proviso in s. 3 and applying the provisions of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 in cases falling within the proviso, Sunder Dass v. Ram Parkash, AIR 1977 SC 1201 (1206): (1977) 2
Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-s. (3) (Essential Commodities Act, 1955)
Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-s. (3) (Essential Commodities Act, 1955), the amount payable to the person required to sell his stock of sugar would be with reference to
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free