Did you mean: 2011 8 sec 497?
2011 8 Scc 497 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Gift
and the differential amount, did not amount to gift, Jagatram Ahuja v. Commissioner of Gift Tax, Hyderabad, (2000) 8 SCC 249; CGT v. N.S. Getty Chettiar, (1971) 2 SCC 741: (1971) 82 ITR 599 [Gift Tax Act, 1958,
Election
declaration of the result under s. 66 of the Act, Election Commission of India v. Ashok Kumar, (2000) 8 SCC 216 (226). (Constitution of India, Art. 329) The word 'election' cannot be restricted only to the electoral process
Consultation
purpose for which the provision for consultation is made, Justice K.P. Mohapatra v. Sri Ram Chandra Nayak, (2002) 8 SCC 1. Takes place by mutual discussions and a consensus is arrived at between different authorities performing different functions
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Cognizance
V. State By DSP, (2005) 4 SCC 512. Means 'taking notice of', S.K. Zutshi v. Bimal Debnath, (2004) 8 SCC 31. Means exercising jurisdiction if it is in respect of a public servant who is accused of an
Grounds
him to make an effective representation against the order of detention, Union of India v. Paul Manickam, (2003) 8 SCC 342: AIR 2003 SC 4622 (4625). (Constitution of India, Art. 22)
Appeal
on the material which the court had before it, State of Gujarat v. Salimbhai Abdul Gaffar Shaikh, (2003) 8 SCC 50: AIR 2003 SC 3224. Means a call to (higher tribunal) for deliverance from decision of lower, Oxford
Decree
in controversy in the suit and may be either preliminary or final, Chandi Prasad v. Jagdish Prasad, (2004) 8 SCC 724 (729). [Civil Procedure Code, 1908, s. 2(2)] Is the final order of a court in a suit,
Dowry
enveloped within the ambit of 'dowry', Satvir Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 2001 SC 2828 (2834): (2001) 8 SCC 633. [Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961), s. (2); Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 304B] See also
Fraud
be evidence on fraud, Ram Preeti Yadav v. Uttar Pradesh, Board of High School and Intermediate Education, (2003) 8 SCC 311: AIR 2003 SC 4268 (4271). Fraud, is false representation by one who is aware that it was
Official duty
which are done by a public servant in discharge of official duty, S.K. Zutshi v. Bimal Debnath, (2004) 8 SCC 31(38); see also State of Orissa v. Ganesh Chandra Jain, (2004) 8 SCC 40. (Cr. P.C., 1973, s.
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free