Did you mean: 2002 1 sec 689?
2002 1 Scc 689 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Family
wrong not to keep that difference in view, C. Krishna Prasad v. C.I.T., AIR 1975 SC 498: (1975) 1 SCC 160: (1975) 2 SCR 709. The expression 'family' has according to the context in which it occurs a
Law
Seventh Schedule to the Constitution', Sachindra Mohan Nandy v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1971 SC 963: (1971) 1 SCC 657: (1971) 3 SCR 795. It includes any enactment, ordinance, regulation, order, bye-law, rule, scheme, notification or other
Negligence
the management and control use due care, Syad Akbar v. State of Karnataka, AIR 1979 SC 1848: (1980) 1 SCC 30: (1980) 1 SCR 95. (iv) Negligence is a term of art but has distinct meanings in different
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Business
transactions must ordinarily be entered into with a profit motive, Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT, (1976) 1 SCC 254: AIR 1976 SC 10 (16): (1976) 1 SCR 461. The word ' business' is one of wide
Company
duties and responsibilities towards the community in which it functions, National Textile Workers' Union v. P.R. Ramakrishnan, (1983) 1 SCC 228: AIR 1983 SC 75. [Companies Act (1 of 1956), s. 3] A company is, in some respects,
Income
the 'known sources of income' of a public servant, State of Madhya Pradesh v. Awadh Kishore Gupta, (2004) 1 SCC 691 (697): AIR 2004 SC 517. [Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, s. 13(1)(e)] Income Travelling allowance is not
Just
a just cause a lawful ground. (Kinney's Law Dictionary) see also Helen C. Rebello v. Maharashtra S.R.T.C., (1999) 1 SCC 90. As probable, reasonable. (Anderson's Law Diction-ary) See also Helen C. Rebello v. Maharashtra S.R.T.C., (1999) 1 SCC
Math
manager of the secular properties of the institution of the math, Shri Krishna Singh v. Mathura Ahir, AIR 1980 SC 707 (713): (1981) 3 SCC 689: (1982) 2 SCR 660. … the institution of the math, Shri Krishna Singh v. Mathura Ahir, AIR 1980 SC 707 (713): (1981) 3 SCC 689: (1982) 2 SCR 660.
Royalty
of 1959)] Royalty is a tax, India Cement Ltd. v. State of T.N., AIR 1990 SC 85: (1990) 1 SCC 12: (1989) Supp 1 SCR 692. In general connotes the State's share in the goods upon which the
Court
parlance it indicates a place where justice is judicially administered, Keshab Narayan Banerjee v. State of Bihar, (2001) 1 SCC 607. In the strict sense of the term, an essential condition is that the court should have, apart
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free