2001 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Dowry
societies. Such payments are not enveloped within the ambit of 'dowry', Satvir Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 2001 SC 2828 (2834): (2001) 8 SCC 633. [Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961), s. (2); Indian Penal
Destruction of buildings
space occupied by the old flats and the new, Vannattakandy Ibrayi v. Kunhabdulla Hajee, (2001) 1 SCC 564: 2001 (1) JT 96: (2001) 1 SCJ 332.
Cut and removed from any land
the lessee under the grant or lease, Divisional Forest Officer v. Tata Finlay, (2001) 5 SCC 684: AIR 2001 SC 2672 (2676). [Kerala Grants and Leases (Modification of Rights) Act, 1980, s. 4] Cut and removed from
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Crime of violence
Crime of violence, is whether the has been the infliction or threat of force or the doing of a hostile act, R (August) v. Criminal Injuries Panel (CA), (2001) 2 WLR 1452. May be committed when...
Court of competent jurisdiction
became an incompetent Court for all purposes, State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bhooraji, (2001) 7 SCC 679: AIR 2001 SC 3372 (3778). [Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, s. 465(1)] The expression 'a court of competent jurisdiction envisaged in
Constitution
i.e. Power to amend the Constitution, Practice and Procedure of Parliament, M.N. Kaul and S.L. Shakdher, 5th Edn., 2001, p. 5. Indian Constitution is republican and federal in character; it embodies salient features of Parliamentary system providing
Conduct disgraceful in a professional respect
from the service of the House, Practice and Procedure of Parliament M.N. Kaul and S.L. Shakdher, 5th Edn., 2001, p. 307. Is the way one acts bearing with respect to propriety, morals and requirements of Law, A
Cause of action
prove each fact, comprises in 'cause of action', Rajasthan High Court Advocates, Asson. v. Union of India, AIR 2001 SC 416 (422): (2001) 2 SCC 294. [Civil Procedure Code, (5 of 1908), s. 20] Cause of action
Levy and collect
imposed or demanded, (AIR 1972 SC 2563 followed), Somaiya Organics (India) Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2001 SC 1723 (1732): (2001) 5 SCC 519. [Constitution of India, Article 265]
Onus probandi, animo attestandi
the evidence is admissible to show whether such was the intention or not, N. Kamalam v. Ayyasamy, AIR 2001 SC 2802 (2803): (2001) 7 SCC 503. [Succession Act, 1925, s. 63(c)]
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free