1963 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Property
of interests which have the insignia or characteristics of proprietary right, Sidhjrabhai Sabbai v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1963 SC 540. Property, is nothing more than the basis of a certain expectation, namely, the expectation of deriving
Injunction
of India v. United Industries Ltd., AIR 1983 SC 1272 (1277): (1983) 4 SCC 625. [Specific Relief Act, 1963, s. 41(b)] This is the discretionary process of preventive and remedial justice, whereby a person is required to
Contravention
the contravention of Art. 13(2) being a continuing matter, Mahendra Lal Jaini v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1963 SC 1019 (1030): 1963 Supp (1) SCR 912. [Constitution of India, Art. 13(2)] Contravention, in relation to any
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Consumption and use
of consumption the commodity must be destroyed or used up, Burma Shell Co. v. Belgaum Borough Municipality, AIR 1963 SC 906: 1963 Supp (2) SCR 216. [Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, (18 of 1925) as Amended by Bom
Consummation
of consumption the commodity must be destroyed or used up, Burma Shell Co. v. Belgaum Borough Municipality, AIR 1963 SC 906: 1963 Supp (2) SCR 216. [Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, (18 of 1925) as Amended by Bom
Building
the term 'Building', State of Bombay v. Sardar Venkat Rao Krishna Rao Gujar, AIR 1966 SC 991 (994): 1963 (1) SCR 428. [Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950 (1 of 1951),
Bond
void if a specified act is performed, or is not performed, as the case may be. [Limitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963), s. 2 (d)] Includes--(a) any instrument whereby a person obliges himself to pay money to
Bill of Exchange
INSTRUMENTS; PROMISSORY NOTES PROTEST; NOTE A BILL, TO; INCHOATE. Includes a hundi and a cheque. [The Limitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963), s. 2 (c)] Means a bill of exchange as defined by the Negotiable Instruments Act,
Declaratory
Declaratory, as the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 is 'declaratory', the presumption against construing it retrospectively so as to respect vested rights, is not applicable. As
Misconduct
was held by this Court in P. H. Kalyani v. AIR France, Calcutta, (1964) 2 SCR 104: AIR 1963 SC 1756: (1963) 1 LLJ 679: 24 FJR 464, wherein it was found that the two mistakes committed
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free