Skip to content

1953 - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Public Order Act, 1936

Public Order Act, 1936 (English) (1 Edw. 8 & 1 Geo. 6, c. 6). An Act to prohibit the wearing of uniforms in connection with political objects and the maintenance by private persons of associations of...

Proprietor

Proprietor, includes a company, Motipur Zamindari Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar, AIR 1953 SC 320. [See also Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950] Means a person as respects a village, muhal or

Projabali

it means settlement with cultivating raiyats only, Sushil Kumar Chakrabarty v. Rajendra Lal Bhattacharya, AIR 1954 Cal 412: 1953 92 Cal LJ 298.

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Precincts

Precincts, the term precincts is usually understood as a space enclosed by walls, AIR 1953 Mad 269. [Factories Act, 1948, s. 2(m)]

Personally interested

Personally interested, does not imply merely intellectual interest but something of the nature of an expectation of advantage to be gained, or of a loss or some disadvantage to be avoided by one who was said...

Other tenure

grant can be deemed to be of the whole village, District Board, Tanjore v. N.K. Noor Mohd., AIR 1953 SC 446. [T.N. Estates Land Act (1 of 1968), s. 3(d), Exp. I]

Reserve

a future time or place. To preserve, Commissioner of Income Tax v. Century Spinning and Manufacturing Co., AIR 1953 SC 501: (1954) SCR 203. (ii) As to what the word 'Reserves' as used in the Business Profits

Tea

includes tea leaves, Goodricke Group Ltd. v. State of West Bengal, 1995 Supp (1) SCC 707. [Tea Act, 1953, s. 3(n)] The Sale of Food (Weights and Measures) Act, 1926 (16 & 17 Geo. 5, c. 63),

Retrenchment

s. 2(oo) and the word 'retrenched' in s. 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as amended by 1953 Act, have no wider meaning than the ordinary accepted connotation of those word and means the discharge of

Scandalising

protection of their rights and liberties, Brahma Prakash Sharma v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1954 SC 10: 1953 SCR 1169.

  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial