Uttaranchal Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gajendra Singh Jangpangi Alias Gangu Vs. Bishan Singh Chupal and Other ...
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Aug-06-2012
V.K. Bist, J. 1. Present Election Petition has been filed for following reliefs: I. Declare the election of the respondent no.1 from 43 Didihat legislative Assembly constituency void. II. Direct for the fresh election in 43 Didihat legislative Assembly constituency. III. Pass appropriate order against Returning Officer who intentionally and deliberately rejected the nomination/candidature of the petitioner. IV. Grant any other and further relief which this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. V. Award the cost of the petition to the Election Petitioner. 2. Election of third Legislative Assembly of State of Uttarakhand was notified by the Election Commission for seventy constituencies. In pursuance of the said notification, the petitioner filed his nomination form for 43-Didihat Legislative Assembly Constituency on 11.01.2012. The Returning Officer of 43-Didihat Legislative Assembly Constituency rejected the nomination paper of the petitioner by declari...
Saeed Ahmed Vs. Shivcharan Singh Bhandari
Court: Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
Decided on: Aug-03-2012
C.C. Pant, Member: 1. This revision petition under Section 17(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been preferred against the order dated 16.07.2012 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun in consumer complaint No. 19 of 2010, thereby dismissing the application moved by the revisionist opposite party for getting the building material used in the property in question and quality thereof tested from a government laboratory. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as stated in the consumer complaint, are that the complainant has entered into an agreement with the opposite party for construction of his residential house. The complainant has alleged that the opposite party has used sub-standard material and has left certain work incomplete. Alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party, the complainant filed a consumer complaint before the District Forum, Dehradun. 3. The revisionist opposite party filed written statement before the District Forum, denying the...
Uttarakhand Public Service Commission Haridwar, District Haridwar Thro ...
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Aug-01-2012
B.S. Verma, J. Oral: Heard Sri B.D. Kandpal, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner. By means of this petition the petitioner has sought a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 5-7-2012 passed by Chief Information Commissioner, Uttarakhand contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition, whereby direction was given to the petitioner to supply the copies of Answer Books of General Hindi and Assay subjects to the respondent, in compliance of order of 1stAppellate Court. According to petitioner examination of Review Officer/Assistant Review Officer in Uttarakhand Secretariat and Uttarakhand Public Service Commission was conducted and a final result was declared on 10th July, 2011. Thereafter respondent filed application under R.T.I. Act seeking photocopies of his all the answer books. The Public Information Officer of the petitioner institution passed order dated 26-3-2012 by which the respondent was intimated to inspect the answer books in ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›