Uttaranchal Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Krishna Kumar Pandey Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Sri Manav Sharma, the learned counsel for the petitioner. List has been revised. Mrs. Beena Pandey, Standing Counsel appears for the State of U.P. No one appears for the U.P. State Textile Corporation Limited. The present petition has a chequered history and it would be appropriate if the facts are narrated in a nutshell. In the year 1990, the petitioner was working as a Reeling-Winding-Incharge in the Kashipur Unit of the U.P. State Textile Corporation Limited. The Chief Executive of the Kashipur Unit for reasons best known to him bore a grudge against the petitioner and issued an order of dismissal dated 15/12/1990 without issuing a show cause notice or a chargesheet. No opportunity was provided to the petitioner. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the order of dismissal dated 15/12/1990, filed writ petition No. 33193 of 1990 before the Allahabad High Court in which an interim order dated 26th July, 1991 was passed staying the effect and operation of the orde...
Rajendra Singh Vs. Additional Director General of Police, Uttaranchal ...
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner was appointed as a Constable in the year 1966 and was posted in various districts of Uttar Pradesh. In the year 1998, the petitioner was posted in District Pauri and applied for voluntary retirement on 06.10.1998. The Superintendent of Police, while processing his voluntary retirement application, found that his application could not be processed as his Character Roll Register was lost while he was serving in Muzaffarnagar and that a duplicate Character Roll was prepared but the same was incomplete. The Superintendent of Police found that such till time as the Character Roll was not complete, his application could not be processed. In this regard, several letters were written to the Superintendent of Police, Moradabad to complete the entries in the duplicate Character Roll Register, so that the petitioners papers for voluntary retirement could be processed. When no action was taken by the authorities of Morada...
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Through Sampati Prabandh Adhikari, Dehra ...
Court: Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
Decided on: Jul-02-2012
C.C. Pant, Member, J. 1. This is an appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 20.10.1993 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun in consumer complaint No. 363 of 1993; Sh. Ram Prakash Vs. Sampati Prabandh Adhikari, U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, thereby directing the appellant to allot the plot in favour of the complainant on the basis of the registration No. RKS/W-111. During the pendency of the proceedings, the complainant Sh. Ram Prakash died on 04.03.1996 and, therefore, in this appeal, the appellant has initially impleaded his wife Smt. Chameli Devi and son Sh. Gauri Shankar. However, during the pendency of this appeal, Smt. Chameli Devi also expired on 09.08.2007 and on the basis of the order dated 23.04.2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Rishikesh in Probate Case No. 04 of 2009; Harshit Singhal Vs. Naman Kumar and others, the name of Sh. Harshit Singhal was substituted in place of late Smt. Chameli Devi. 2. Briefly st...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›