Uttaranchal Court February 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sher Singh and Another Vs. State of Uttaranchal
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Feb-24-2012
U.C. Dhyani, J. 1. Criminal law was set into motion at the instance of Sunder Singh s/o Jodh Singh villager Sartola, Tehsil Gangolihaat, district Pithoragarh in the instant case. He wrote a complaint (Ext.Ka-2) on 16.08.1999 enumerating the facts therein that on 16.08.1999 at 11:30 a.m. informant’s father Jodh Singh had altercation with appellant Bhim Singh over jointness of courtyard. Another appellant Sher Singh who was father of appellant Bhim Singh came from the forest in the meanwhile. Sher Singh tried to inflict blow of lathi on Jodh Singh but was saved by his (informant’s son) Sunder Singh. After some time Bhim Singh again came to informant’s courtyard, caught hold of hands of Jodh Singh and put knife on his neck. Appellant Sher Singh came running in the courtyard along with a lathi (stick) and gave a blow of stick on head of Jodh Singh, who became unconscious and fell on the ground. Sher Singh gave another blow of lathi on Jodh Singh. Sher Singh and Bhim Sing...
iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited, Through Authorised Sign ...
Court: Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
Decided on: Feb-13-2012
C.C. Pant, Member, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 03.11.2010 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar, allowing the consumer complaint No. 280 of 2008 and directing the opposite party No. 1 appellant to pay to the complainant a sum of Rs. 50,000/- within a month from the date of the order. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that late Sh. Devichand Saini, the father of the complainant, was insured with Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited opposite party No. 1 under an accidental insurance scheme linked with the purchase of fertilizer. The assured died on 16.03.2008 in a road accident. The complainant filed the insurance claim with the insurance company after completing all the formalities. According to the complainant, he was entitled to get a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- against the said insurance policy, but the insurance company repudiated the claim on the ground that the complainant had not submitted the copy of the FIR, Panchnama, documents relating to...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›