Uttaranchal Court February 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Vs. Jethu
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Feb-15-2008
Reported in: 2008CriLJ3113
Prafulla C. Pant, J.1. The appeal preferred under Section 378 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 7-1-1991, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Uttarkashi, in Sessions Trial No. 2 of 1990, whereby respondent Jethu has been acquitted of charge of offences punishable under Section 354 and one punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as I.P.C.)2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the entire lower Court record.3. Prosecution story in brief is that on 9-1-1990, P.W. 2 Deepa was cutting grass in the jungle within the limits of village Malli, Patwari Circle Badhangaon, District Uttarkashi. At some distance P.W. 1 Smt. Sauna Devi (mother of Deepa) and deceased Darshan Singh (father of Deepa) were also cutting grass. At about 6 p.m. accused Jethu came near Deepa (P.W. 2) and with intention to outrage her modesty dragged her towards a bush. She raised an alarm on...
State Bank of India, Branch Dangoli Vs. Sher Singh and anr.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Feb-13-2008
Reported in: AIR2009Utr7
ORDERRajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri D.S. Patni counsel for the appellant and Sri R.C. Upadhyay counsel for the respondents.2. Present second appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 14.7.2004 passed by the District Judge, Bageshwar allowing the appeal of defendant Sri Sher Singh and setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court.3. Briefly stated appellant State Bank of India filed a suit before the Civil Judge (S.D.), Bageshwar for the recovery of Rs. 31,660/- from the defendants Sher Singh and Kunwar Singh. According to the plaintiff, defendant Sher Singh obtained a loan of Rs. 25.000/- from State Bank of India Branch Dangoli for the development of his business. The defendant executed a promissory note in favour of the plaintiff and also executed deed for hypothecation of property. Defendant Kunwar Singh also stood surety for the plaintiff and he executed necessary documents in favour of the plaintiff. The defendant agreed to pay 12% interest wi...
Uttaranchal Power Corporation Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Workmen's Compensation ...
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Feb-12-2008
Reported in: [2008(117)FLR560]; (2008)IIILLJ183UC
Rajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri N.S. Negi, counsel for the appellant and Sri Mohinder Singh Bisht holding the brief of Sri Gopal Narain, counsel for the respondent.2. Present appeal has been filed against the judgment and award dated June 3, 2004 passed by the Workmen-Compensation Commissioner in W.C.A., No. 3 of 1998 Smt. Gomti Devi v. U.P.S.E.B. (presently known as Uttaranchal Power Corporation Ltd.), Distribution Division, Almora and Others, whereby the respondent No. 2 has been awarded a sum of Rs. 1,52,753/- towards compensation along with interest @ 12% per annum.3. Briefly stated, a claim petition was filed by the claimant/respondent No. 1 being W.C.A., No. 3 of 1998 Smt. Gomti Devi v. U.P.S.E.B. (presently known as Uttaranchal Power Corporation Ltd.), Distribution Division, Almora and Others stating therein that due to shot of current, the deceased who was working on a pillar of electricity died on December 18, 1986. At the time of accident, the deceased was 22 years of age and w...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›