Uttaranchal Court January 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dalip Singh Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Jan-24-2007
Reported in: AIR2007Utr50
Dharam Veer, J.1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for writ of mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 3 to issue him transit pass (Ravanna) for transportation of wood logs from Suakot Pokhari to Haldwani Town.2. Brief facts of the case as narrated by the petitioner are that petitioner is permanent resident of Village Suwakot Pokhari, Patti Padampur, Tehsil Dhari and Bhumidhar Tenure Holder of Khet Nos. 869, 871, 902, 903, 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003/2 and 30 situated in the revenue area of the said village and some trees of different varieties were also situated in the bhumidhari land of the petitioner. The petitioner moved an application before the District Magistrate, Nainital with a prayer to issue ownership certificate about the said trees. The District Magistrate, Nainital after making necessary enquiry issued ownership certificate of the trees in favour of the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner moved an application before respondent No. 3 to cut the trees ...
Rishi Pal Vs. District Inspector of School and ors.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Jan-03-2007
Reported in: 2007(1)AWC933
Prafulla C. Pant, J.1. By means of this writ petition, moved under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought direction setting aside order dated 8.4.2003, passed by the respondent No. 3, Principal of Kishan Vidyalaya Inter College, Laksar, district Haridwar (hereinafter referred as the College), whereby the services of the petitioner were terminated under Section 16G read with Regulation 25 of Regulations framed under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.3. Brief facts of the case, as narrated in the writ petition, are that the petitioner Rishi Pal was qualified for the appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher in L.T. Grade and was appointed on said post in the pay scale of Rs. 1400-2300 vide order dated 30th August, 1992, passed by respondent No. 1. The said appointment was made under Chapter II Regulation 9A of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 (hereinafter referred as the ...
Gyaneshwar Kimothi Vs. Garhwal Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. and anr.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Jan-03-2007
Reported in: 2007(1)AWC941(UHC)
Prafulla C. Pant, J.1. By means of this petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing order dated 30.4.2003, whereby the respondent No. 2, allegedly a junior to the petitioner, has been given promotional pay scale of Rs. 1940-2900 w.e.f. 20.8.1996, treating him senior over the petitioner and two others namely, A.K. Bose and D.S. Negi.2. Brief facts of the case, as narrated in the writ petition, are that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Manager with respondent No. 1 Garhwal Mandal Vikas Nigam (hereinafter referred as the Nigam) in the pay scale of Rs. 515-865 vide order dated 16.6.1986. According to the petitioner, the post of the Assistant Manager is senior to that of the post of Catering In-charge, held by the respondent No. 2. It is further stated in the writ petition that the petitioner was given promotional pay scale vide order dated 20.8.1996 of Rs. 1940-2900, after examining his service...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›