Uttaranchal Court August 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satya Prasad Vs. New India Assurance Co. and ors.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Aug-04-2006
Reported in: II(2007)ACC817
Rajeev Gupta, C.J.1. This is claimant's appeal for enhancement of the compensation awarded by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/District Judge, Dehradun vide Award dated 2.8.2003 passed in M.A.C.T. No. 153 of 1998.2. Appellant/claimant Satya Prasad Pant claimed compensation of Rs. 3,74,000 for the injuries suffered by him in the motor accident on 18.4.1998 when his bus bearing registration No. UP 07-G-9621 was hit by a private bus bearing registration No. UP02-C-6143 resulting in multiple serious injuries to the claimant. The claimant further pleaded that, on account of the injuries and the fractures sustained by him in the accident, he was rendered unfit to pursue his occupation as Bus Driver in U.P. Road Transport Corporation.3. The owner, driver and the insurer of the private bus bearing registration No. UP 02-C-6143 contested the claim and pleaded that the accident took place on account of the negligence of the claimant, himself.4. The Tribunal, on the evidence led by the parties, hel...
New India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Dhanpal Singh Panwar and ors.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Aug-03-2006
Reported in: 2008ACJ568; AIR2007Utr18
Rajeev Gupta, C.J.1. Sri. V. K. Kohli, Senior Counsel with Sri. T. Pande, Advocate for the appellant is heard on admission.2. This is insurer's appeal against the Award dated 28-1-2006 passed by Motor Accident claims Tribunal, Dehradun in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 208 of 2004, whereby the appellant Insurance Company has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 2,25,000/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of the claim petition i.e. 29-9-2004 to the claimants as compensation for the death of Km. Shaila daughter of respondents 1 and 2 and sister of respondents 3 and 4.3. The claimants claimed compensation of Rs. 3,10,000/- for the death of Km. Shaila, aged about 13 years in the motor accident on 30-8-2004 when she was dashed by the offending vehicle - Tata Sumo bearing registration No. UA-12-0414 resulting in serious injuries to Km. Shaila, who succumbed to those injuries next day in the hospital.4. The owner, driver and the insurer of the offending vehicle-Tata Sumo contested...
State of U.P. Vs. Jaman Singh and anr.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Aug-02-2006
Reported in: AIR2007Utr10; 2007(1)ARBLR373(Uttaranchal)
ORDERPrafulla C. Pant, J.1. This appeal, preferred under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred as the Code), is 3 directed against the judgment and decree dated 25-11-1983, passed in civil suit No. J 26 of 1983, by learned District Judge, Chamoli, whereby suit for injunction has i been decreed by the trial Court.I heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the lower Court record.3. Brief facts of the case are that plain-3 tiffs/respondents filed a suit against defendant/appellant with the pleadings that in August 1980, forest department of the defendant invited tenders for felling of 184 trees of 'DEODAR' (Cedar) and 'KAIL' in lot 5 No. 63/1980-81 in first aVid second range of Dunagiri, Joshimath. The plaintiffs/respondents gave highest bid of Rs. 2,01,000/-, which was accepted by the defendant/appellant vide letter dated 13-8-1981. The defendant further sanctioned felling of 100 more trees in favour of the plaintiffs. Again, on 24-4-1982 vide let...
Udyag Shukla Vs. Sessions Judge and ors.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Aug-01-2006
Reported in: 2007CriLJ707
ORDERB.C. Kandpal, J.1. This petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, Udhyag Shukla for quashing the proceedings in Session Trial No. 37 of 1999 pending in the Court of Sessions Judge, Nainital under Sections 384, 420 of I.P.C. and Section 9 of Prevention of Corruption Act.2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner has formed a society in order to save the pollution of the environment and the name of that society is 'Society For Nature, Environment and Humanity' popularly known as 'SNH'.3. According to the petition, number of people of Nainital informed the applicant/petitioner about the illegal felling of the trees in large scale and the petitioner on his own information confirmed that news and approached the local authorities for taking action against the responsible persons. The illegal felling of trees was being done in an area of about 14 acres of land at Sona Pani Estates situated at Satauni Village of district Nainital which was purchased by ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›