Uttaranchal Court May 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Afzal Ahmed Vs. Mohd. Faizan and anr.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: May-03-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ3806
ORDERJ.C.S. Rawat, J.1. This Criminal Revision has been directed against the judgment and order passed by the learned IInd Addl. Civil Judge (JD)/Judicial Magistrate Roorkee. Dist. Haridwar dated 27-3-2001 in Criminal Complaint Case No. 12 of 2000, Afzal Ahmed v. Mohd. FaizanUnder Section 138 of the N.I. Act with fine of Rs. 1,200/ and in default of payment of fine an imprisonment for two months.2. Brief facts leading to this revision are that a complaint was filed before the learned Judicial MagistrateUnder Section 138 of the N. I. Act alleging therein that the respondent No. 1 had given a cheque of Rs. 30,000/- to the revisionist and the said cheque was dishonoured. Statutory notice was given but in spite of the notice, the amount was not paid hence complaint was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate. The learned Magistrate took the cognizance and thereafter proceeded with the trial. After the conclusion of the trial, the learned Magistrate held that the prosecution had establ...
Banbir Singh Vs. State of Uttaranchal
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: May-02-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ4181
1. The accused/appellant Banbir Singh has preferred this criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 29.11.2001, passed by Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, in S.T. No. 308/1999, convicting the accused/appellant under Sections 498-A I.P.C. 304-B I.P.C. and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life under Section 304-B I.P.C.; two years R.I. under Section 498-A I.P.C. and five years R.I. and fine of Rs. 15,000/- under Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act and in default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for one year. All the sentences to run concurrently.2. The prosecution case in brief is that on 13.6.1999 at about 3.10 p.m. complainant Rajesh Singh lodged written report, Ext. Ka. 1 at P.S. Banbasa with the allegations that his younger sister Smt. Rekha Singh was married to accused Banbir Singh on 12.3.1999. After marriage accused demanded rupees one lac as dowry. The dowry demand was not fulfilled by the complainant and due to ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›