Uttaranchal Court September 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Darshan Lal Vs. State
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Sep-01-2004
Reported in: 2005CriLJ1488
Irshad Hussain, J.1. Appellant Darshan Lal was arrested on 22-2-1995 in FIR No. 2/1995, dated 19-2-1995, of Parwari /Circle Girsha, District Chamoli and after investigation charged for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code in Sessions Trial No. 14 of 1995 by the Sessions Judge, Chamoli. After completion of the trial, appellant was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- (one thousand).2. Not satisfied with his conviction and sentence appellant preferred this appeal from jail.3. Appellant was married to witness Smt. Darshani Devi (P.W.4). Their residential house is in village Uttaron of aforesaid Patwari Circle. Bala Lal deceased aged about 13-14 years was brother of appellant's wife. Bala Lal a student of class-VI was residing with the appellant. Smt. Panna Devi (P.W.2), the elder sister of Smt. Darshani Devi and Km. Prabha. aged about 12 years, niece of the appellant, were also residing with the appe...
Kush Kumar Vs. State of Uttaranchal
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Sep-01-2004
Reported in: 2005CriLJ1639
J.C.S. Rawat, J.1. This is a criminal appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'Code') against the judgment and order dated 8-9-1995 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Haridwar convicting under Section 364/394/302, IPC and sentencing the appellant Kush Kumar to undergo R.I. for life imprisonment in each count. However, by the said judgment and order the other accused Sunil Kumar alias Bhura was not found guilty under Section 364/394/302. IPC and he was acquitted.2. The brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are that on 30-1-1992 when Sandeep Sharma (P.W, 10) the agent of 'Sachin Travels' was sitting in the office of the 'Sachin Travels' Haridwar two persons one Rakesh Kumar and other who did not disclose his name came to 'Sachin Travels to book the taxi from Haridwar to Meerut for two days from 30-1-1992. Sandeep Sharma, the agent of 'Sachin Travels' Haridwar, booked the taxi @ Rs. 1000/- and they gave Rs. 500/- as advance to him. They furt...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›