Uttaranchal Court March 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kusum Lata (Ms.) Vs. Director of Factories and anr.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Mar-26-2004
Reported in: [2004(101)FLR1167]; (2004)IIILLJ357UC
P.C. Verma, A.C.J. and Rajesh Tandon, J.1. By means of the present Writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to fix the salary of the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of Rule 3-A of the U.P. Factories Welfare Officers' Rules, 1955 w.e.f. January 1, 1986. The petitioner has further claimed a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the entire arrears of salary including difference of salary, as fixed by the respondents and as claimed by the petitioner together with 18% interest per annum. The petitioner has also prayed for declaring the order dated July 28, 1990/March 10, 1990 fixing the pay of the petitioner w. e.f. February 27, 1990 as illegal, null and void.2. Brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition according to the case of the petitioner's husband are that the petitioner's husband was appointed as a Labour Welfare Officer, Grade II in the respondent-Suga...
Rizwana and ors. Vs. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/District Judge U.S ...
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Mar-16-2004
Reported in: IV(2005)ACC192
Irshad Hussain, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and order dated 20.8.2003 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar in M.A.C.T. Case No. 188/2002.2. Atique Ahmad deceased met with a motor vehicle accident and a claim petition was preferred by his heirs, the appellants. By aforesaid judgment and order the petition was allowed and the appellants were awarded compensation amounting to Rs. 1,72,000.00. Direction in regard to the disbursement of the said amount was also given and in view of it appellant No. 1, the widow was permitted to withdraw only a sum of Rs. 10,000.00 in cash whereas the remaining amount of compensation was directed to be invested in fixed deposit scheme of a Bank. A sum of Rs. 25,000.00 each was directed to be invested in the fixed deposit scheme in favour of the minor children, the appellant Nos. 2 to 4 and whereas a sum of Rs. 50,000.00 was directed to be invested in f...
Goraya Straw Board Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Mar-12-2004
Reported in: [2005]139STC156(Uttra)
1. Heard Sri S.K. Posti, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the issue of a writ of certiorari quashing the circular dated August 5, 2000 (annexure 2 to the writ petition) and the circular dated August 19, 2000 (annexure 3 to the writ petition) issued by respondent No. 3 insofar as it relates to the deletion of the diesel oil from the recognition certificate. The petitioner has also prayed for the issue of a mandamus, restraining the respondents from taking any process in pursuance of the circular dated August 19, 2000 and the circular dated August 5, 2000 issued by the respondents. The petitioner has also prayed for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to issue form III-B regularly for the purchase of diesel oil to be used in diesel generator set for the running of factory of the petitioner.3. The petitioner is a public limited company incorporated under the ...
Siddheshwari Paper Udyog Limited Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Mar-12-2004
Reported in: [2005]142STC355(Uttra)
1. Heard Sri S.K. Posti, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the issue of a writ of certiorari quashing the circular dated August 5, 2000 (annexure 2 to the writ petition), the notices dated September 19, 2000 and August 24, 2000 (annexures 3 and 4 to the writ petition) issued by the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 respectively in so far as it relates to the deletion of the diesel oil from the recognition certificate. The petitioner has also prayed for the issue of a mandamus restraining the respondents from taking any process in pursuance of the notices dated September 19, 2000 and August 24, 2000 and circular dated August 5, 2000 issued by the respondents. The petitioner has also prayed for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to issue form III-B regularly for the purchase of diesel oil to be used in diesel generator set for the running of factory of the petitioner....
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›